NYC cue dude
Banned
But something else to consider- anyone know why Danny Dilberto insists that Willie never ran the 526?
What ever happened to old "Earl Bruney", ? LOL
isn't he famous for losing to Mosconi by only 523 points, in one inning! :grin-square::grin-square:
That may be in a book but this link it comes out of his mouth that he did not miss and quit because he was tired... Go to mark 10:10 of the video...
https://youtu.be/ItPxJuAoimE
Which one is true... Maybe only Willie knows..
OK, first off, that "book" was Mosconi's official biography, written with Stanley Cohen, who had access to Mosconi and his personal recollections over the course six hundred pages of transcripts from recorded interviews, and a treasure trove of clippings, memorabilia, and interviews with many others, to include Charlie Ursitti.
Second, though Willie is generally known to have died of a heart attack, what is not widely known is that later in life he also suffered from Alzheimers. So it is possible, if not likely, that what he recalled in his later years was that he was tired and perhaps not that he missed.
Third, there were other accounts from that night that mention he missed. One of them is in "The Hustler & The Champ" R.A. Dyer's wonderful book on the rivalry between Mosconi and Fats. In that book there is a great passage filled with tons of details from that night in Springfield (who knew Mosconi was an adept pinball player?!). Here is an excerpt:
#####
“During the early morning hours of March 20, 1954, Mosconi completed a run of 526 balls. Again, that’s 5-2-6. It represented at least thirty-four racks of straight pool and maybe more depending on how one does the counting. It is a record that has remained standing for more than five decades, and, in fact, may never be surpassed. It is pool’s most cherished record and in all ways as startling as DiMaggio’s fifty-six game hitting streak, or the hundred-point game by Wilt Chamberlain.
‘At 12:50 a.m., he missed the 527th shot — a six-ball in the corner. It tottered at the pocket but would not fall, said Hatfield.’ (Dick Hatfield was a long-term regular of Springfield’s East High Billiards.) At 1:10 a.m., the Springfield News and Sun was called to report the story... Lefty made a sketch of the missed shot, the fifth of the final rack. It jawed out of the corner. That's when Mosconi looked up, smiled apologetically, and said he was getting tired anyway."
#####
Lou Figueroa
... Lefty made a sketch of the missed shot, the fifth of the final rack. ...
But something else to consider- anyone know why Danny Dilberto insists that Willie never ran the 526?
I'm pretty sure DD isn't the most impartial individual when the name Willie Mosconi comes up.
This story doesn't jibe with the autobiography. See post #173. The autobiography says Bruney made 3 balls off the break and Willie took it from there. That would mean he made 11 balls in the first rack, then 36 full racks of 14, and then 11 balls in the final rack (assuming he never pocketed the 15th ball of a rack along with the 14th).
So that's quite a difference -- 11 balls in the final rack versus 4 from the Dyer/Hatfield account.
So I'd say either (1) the autobiography is wrong as to when the run started, or (2) the Dyer book (Hatfield account) is wrong as to the situation when it ended, or (3) Willie's run was something different from 526 (could be more or less), or (4) some combination of these.
Ergo, I think it's fair to say that while someone's recollection might be slightly off, option (3) and the outcome of 526, is not.
Lou Figueroa
... Ergo, I think it's fair to say that while someone's recollection might be slightly off, option (3) and the outcome of 526, is not. ...
Yes there have been unconfirmed runs that may have beat him... Not my question.
Why in todays state of the game, when competition is tougher than ever... Why do we not have umpteen players capable of running 500+ balls?
Was he really that good? Table conditions? Nobody plays straight pool anymore? Etc.
Please share your thoughts. (I am using this question as a survey in my sociology class, so your answeres are greatly appreciated)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
I don't think it's impossible but I believe if someone made a substantial offer to the first guy to break it you would have a lot of people trying. I don't believe there is enough incentive for a player to break the run because of the time that would have to be invested. It's such an incredible feat done on a 4x8 with 5 1/2 in pkts. I think it would even make it more awesome if it was broken on the same equipment!!
So was it 5" or 5 1/2" pockets?Yes there have been unconfirmed runs that may have beat him... Not my question.
Why in todays state of the game, when competition is tougher than ever... Why do we not have umpteen players capable of running 500+ balls?
Was he really that good? Table conditions? Nobody plays straight pool anymore? Etc.
Please share your thoughts. (I am using this question as a survey in my sociology class, so your answeres are greatly appreciated)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
I don't think it's impossible but I believe if someone made a substantial offer to the first guy to break it you would have a lot of people trying. I don't believe there is enough incentive for a player to break the run because of the time that would have to be invested. It's such an incredible feat done on a 4x8 with 5 1/2 in pkts. I think it would even make it more awesome if it was broken on the same equipment!!
Just asking. Huge Willie Fan.
Not quite old enough to have watched him in his prime but.....
LOVED him in his MTV Days!!!!! He was "Bad to the Bone" Lol
So was it 5" or 5 1/2" pockets?
Just asking. Huge Willie Fan.
Not quite old enough to have watched him in his prime but.....
LOVED him in his MTV Days!!!!! He was "Bad to the Bone" Lol
My bad it was 5 1/4 in corners. Here are the details below.
Mosconi set the world record by running 526 consecutive balls without a miss during a straight pool exhibition in Springfield, Ohio on March 19–20, 1954. To this day the record has not been toppled and many speculate it may never be bested.[10][11] A handwritten and notarized affidavit[12] with the signatures of more than 35 eyewitnesses exists as proof of this feat.
The record was set on a 4 × 8 foot Brunswick table with 5 1/4 inch corner pockets at the East High Billiard Club. Today's standard for tables may be considered more difficult to play on than this exhibition table in the sense that longer shots are required (today's standard tables are 9 x 4 1/2 ft) with 4 1/2 to 4 3/4 inch pockets, but today's tables may be considered easier to play on in the sense that there is more room for the balls to spread, creating unfettered shots. Mosconi competed successfully on 4 1/2 × 9 and 5 x 10 ft tables. The 526-ball record just happened to be on a 4 × 8 ft table, a size seldom used in professional play, but used for the billiard club exhibition that day. In fact, the room owner expected the exhibition to take place on the room's 9 foot table.[citation needed] That table was not a Brunswick, so Willie was required to play on one of the Brunswick 8 foot tables.
Hey I was missquoted! LolMy bad it was 5 1/4 in corners. Here are the details below.
Mosconi set the world record by running 526 consecutive balls without a miss during a straight pool exhibition in Springfield, Ohio on March 19–20, 1954. To this day the record has not been toppled and many speculate it may never be bested.[10][11] A handwritten and notarized affidavit[12] with the signatures of more than 35 eyewitnesses exists as proof of this feat.
The record was set on a 4 × 8 foot Brunswick table with 5 1/4 inch corner pockets at the East High Billiard Club. Today's standard for tables may be considered more difficult to play on than this exhibition table in the sense that longer shots are required (today's standard tables are 9 x 4 1/2 ft) with 4 1/2 to 4 3/4 inch pockets, but today's tables may be considered easier to play on in the sense that there is more room for the balls to spread, creating unfettered shots. Mosconi competed successfully on 4 1/2 × 9 and 5 x 10 ft tables. The 526-ball record just happened to be on a 4 × 8 ft table, a size seldom used in professional play, but used for the billiard club exhibition that day. In fact, the room owner expected the exhibition to take place on the room's 9 foot table.[citation needed] That table was not a Brunswick, so Willie was required to play on one of the Brunswick 8 foot tables.
I want credit for my MTV reference haha
Yes there have been unconfirmed runs that may have beat him... Not my question.
Why in todays state of the game, when competition is tougher than ever... Why do we not have umpteen players capable of running 500+ balls?
Was he really that good?
Table conditions?
Nobody plays straight pool anymore? Etc.
Please share your thoughts. (I am using this question as a survey in my sociology class, so your answers are greatly appreciated)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You all know how great Earl was on his prime.. He told on interview that he tried to beat Mosconi´s record for some time and he got 409 or 408.. Back in 80´s tables weren´t too tight.. That tell me something. If Earl dedicated something like beating Willies record and can´t beat it.. Don´t make up excuses.![]()