I can only guess:I'm a bit surprised at how empty the arena is, especially since it's in Vietnam. Could it be a bad time of day or ticket prices being too high?
How can the player continue to shoot?... How can the ref(s) make this terrible call? ...
In real time, I must concede that it was not an easy call to make. With video review, however, I thought the call was so obvious they would call a foul within ten seconds. No way the nine travels that far on a good hit of the four ball. I can only wonder what their reasoning was.![]()
102K views · 876 reactions | Well, well, well.... correct call or not...? 👀 Drama late in the quarter-final between Robbie Capito and Max Lechner, as the hit on the 4-ball was deemed legal... #WNT | #HanoiOpenPool 🇻🇳 | Matchroom Pool
Well, well, well.... correct call or not...? 👀 Drama late in the quarter-final between Robbie Capito and Max Lechner, as the hit on the 4-ball was deemed legal... #WNT | #HanoiOpenPool 🇻🇳.www.facebook.com
How can the ref(s) make this terrible call? Referee Pool Physics 101. There is no way the CB would deviate to the left like that if it hit the 4-ball first and the 9-ball second. Lechner got robbed.
I believe the ref could not tell, so they treated it as if the cue ball hit both the 4 and 9 at the same time, or gave the shooter benefit of the doubtIn real time, I must concede that it was not an easy call to make. With video review, however, I thought the call was so obvious they would call a foul within ten seconds. No way the nine travels that far on a good hit of the four ball. I can only wonder what their reasoning was.
FYI, a simultaneous hit is a foul under the rules. It was an awful, indefensible, call.I believe the ref could not tell, so they treated it as if the cue ball hit both the 4 and 9 at the same time, or gave the shooter benefit of the doubt
new 2025 WPA rules, simultaneous hit is deemed good hitFYI, a simultaneous hit is a foul under the rules. It was an awful, indefensible, call.
FYI, a simultaneous hit is a foul under the rules. It was an awful, indefensible, call.
Thanks for the info on the updated rules. Still, there was no doubt on this occasion. The nine was clearly hit first and could never have moved as far as it did on a legal hit of the four. Shame on the refs for making an awful call at a big moment in a tournament.new 2025 WPA rules, simultaneous hit is deemed good hit
and per new WNT rules, which based on WPA rules, benefit of the doubt goes to the shooter when it is so close to call
I read these set of rules last week
I agree, but we have seen Marcel made similarly bad callsThanks for the info on the updated rules. Still, there was no doubt on this occasion. The nine was clearly hit first and could never have moved as far as it did on a legal hit of the four. Shame on the refs for making an awful call at a big moment in a tournament.
No pool referee should ever get this one wrong.
Agreed, and I've noted before, when a referee has a snooker background, he has not been trained for or had to deal very often with the "close hit" call that comes up so often in pool. Marcel is a consummate professional and has consistently improved as a referee, but in this regard, he remains a work in progress.I agree, but we have seen Marcel made similarly bad calls
I agree, but we have seen Marcel made similarly bad calls