yobagua said:If we could all perform at our expected level why would we need competition? There are thousands of Olympic athletes who train all their lives for their special event. Why are there winners and why are there losers. Because they are human beings doing it and not machines or robots. That is what makes the event so interesting and important. You could say to an athlete ""you didnt win a medal why not? Arent you a trained athlete?". You would sound so stupid.
I understand a need for an audience to see perfection. When Pavarotti failed to crack a high C the Italians booed him. Never mind he was a great tenor. But sometimes it dont happen and all your feelings about what a aficianado and "student of the game" you are goes out the window. Its because you yourself are not up there doing it. So your judgement is really of the fan. The amateur. Someone who has no idea what it is to be competing for the best in the world.
exactly, from the eyes of an spectator. I can just imagine the WTF, OS, HS profanities uttered during those crucial misses. though I must say that I also love to watch perfection, though I also don't miss to give a benefit of a doubt to those two players being in the finals. remember that Superman got Kryptonite for a weakness, and Lex Luthor's got a bald head.


