Looks like a set or Aramith standards on the left and a set of Aramith premiers on the right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

july9x said:

View attachment 923495

Click to expand...

This would have been a great thing to mention on the stream. The commentator in the video appears to have no clue this was the case and it would have avoided all of this.

Jude Rosenstock said:

Laz was right both in letter and spirit. The adjacent rail to the intended pocket does not constitute a kick.

Click to expand...

How about this, if he drew off the l/s of the ball and caught the tit and ball/split-tit, who would make that call .

John oleson said:

Is the WNT annual membership $100 worthwhile?

Click to expand...

depends on the amount of events. i think it probably is but i have been paying month to month because the schedule was so sparse in spring - early summer.

We used to call players doing that ''bad action'' in most instances....if the above rule states that, then that's that.

John oleson said:

Is the WNT annual membership $100 worthwhile?

Click to expand...

If you mean WNT.TV ... depends on how much pool you watch. I'd say it's worth $60 a year to me, but I don't mind contributing to pro pool.

Alternatively, you could subscribe to WNT only for the months you want to get the big events. Might cost you $40 to $60 a year going that route.

td873 said:

I thought the OP was asking for pool room chalk not individual.

-td

Click to expand...

He means his personal pool room that was just built. There's another thread about it.

Frosty said:

Doing what Emily does, chase after ways to put more shekels in MR’s coffers. If MR was really interested in making pool into something they would have put a pool person at the helm instead of her. They’re interested in , hence Emily’s coronation, pool is just a means to an end for her.

Click to expand...

You make some good observations in this thread. This is not one of them.

A "pool" person is not an expert necessarily in media production, marketing, scheduling and all the non-pool things that go into trying to build a profession pool tour. Those are different skills.

It's possible a pool person could have or develop those skills, too, but it's not like there are lots of obvious candidates. I sure can't think of any. The field of potential talent to do her job is very thin.

If Frazer really wanted a means to an end, what's more, she would not have sought to run the WNT. It might be a dead-end job.

There are few "shekels" in pro pool despite the efforts of Matchroom and Predator. Matchroom is not making any money on pool. I doubt anyone is going to give her a much bigger job based on what she does with the WNT.

She would have better off trying to become the head of darts.

skogstokig said:

dunno. i think it's to differentiate from the smaller satellite events, but it makes little sense to me. this event is just 25k or 30k first prize? there should be a money limit for the term major, over 60k first prize or something like that

Click to expand...

That's the answer. The WNT consists of events that are produced by Matchroom and those that are not (satellite events). The ones produced by Matchroom generally pay out a lot more.