2026 WPA Predator Men's World 10 Ball Saigon
- By straightline
- Main Forum
- 525 Replies
Is this on Youtube?she's playing with a log of a cue. looks like over 13mm tip, and conical.
and she beat rubilen cleanly. will play pia in the final.
Is this on Youtube?she's playing with a log of a cue. looks like over 13mm tip, and conical.
and she beat rubilen cleanly. will play pia in the final.
The pressure gradients - which probably don't affect math, will be different than in a straight ahead set. (people are dumm)Out of curiosity, I wrote a program that enumerates all possible outcomes of a Predator Pro Billiards Series match and collected some stats that I thought might be interesting to people.
Assuming:
- Player A is rated 50 Fargo points higher than Player B (odds of him winning any particular rack: 58.58%)
- The odds of Player A winning a shootout are the same as his odds of winning a rack
Here are the stats I've calculated:
- The odds of Player A winning a Predator match against player B: 76.12%
- The odds of Player A winning the match but NOT winning more racks: 3.07%
- The odds of the match going to a shootout: 7.25%
- The odds of Player A winning 9 racks but losing the match: 5.17%
- The average number of racks played for a Predator match between these two players: 13.93
Ultimately, the odds of player A winning such a match are the same as if the players just played a regular race-to-9 match.
Disclaimer: I'm not trying to say that either format is better, I just wanted to have a better understanding of how the formats compare to each other.
Mathematically, the way Fargo ratings are calculated, the difference is the same.
I think the difference you're seeing is that, at very high ratings, both players have high likelihood of a clearance. So the difference for any given rack is harder to notice. You probably have to zoom out to the match level to see the same difference that you see for lower-rated players. But, ultimately, the difference is the same.
I spoke too soon. They are having break problems, at least Pia is.
Unless you have played the game for so long that you just don't care unless something that matters is on the line. League play doesn't matter one bit.
Well, tight tables would be at least part of the reason. Successful breaks in recent Predator 10-Ball events have generally been somewhere around 50%, plus or minus a bit. Years ago in 10-Ball events, with larger pockets, the percentage tended to be a bit higher. Of course, lots of factors other than pocket size can have an effect.
On the same table where the Shaw/SVB match produced a 21% success rate (6 of 28) on Thursday, the E. Kaçi/Duong match produced an 88% (14 of 16) rate on Wednesday.
I try to note who is refereeing each match, but sometimes I don't know the names and don't list the refs in my stats thread for that event.
I don't think the ref who handled the Shaw/SVB match yesterday has been on any of the other matches I have tracked so far in this event.
Unless you have played the game for so long that you just don't care unless something that matters is on the line. League play doesn't matter one bit.This is true and a bit harder to catch. But if a 600 player is consistently beating 400s by like 9-7, an astute TD will notice something is wrong. The occasional result like that can happen, but you’d expect a lot of 9-2 type scores with that skill gap.
It's called being interested or being in the mood to beat balls around like a chimpanzee. At this point in my life I could care less whether I win or lose a rack of pool being played for "fun". Once you accept that you are never going to improve your game to the next level your priorities change. No pride? Call it whatever but losing a game of pool has zero effect on me. Particularly to people who wouldn't gamble with you in a million years.they dont have to dump just simply always play way below their best speed in all fargo rated events. then shoot better when the cash is bigger.
Eddie is a great guy, excellent business man, very honest and a man of faithI've been watching that channel for like 2 years, I think. I haven't dealt with Eddie P. directly, but he seems pretty honest showing any issues with cues and whatnot.
That's strong as fk. Filler only had 1 break and run in his win vs Souto.
Mario blew his chances to take control of the match. He would probably benefit from losing weight, I speculate that his stamina takes a hit during these lengthy tournaments.