How to Judge SPLIT HITS … Everything You Need to Know
- By GideonF
- Main Forum
- 37 Replies
Good point. Refs need practice making these types of calls to become better at making correct calls live. Dedicated training with guidance concerning what to look for and where best to stand would also help.
I do discuss this. I think I made it clear that unless super slow motion video is available to clearly show thin-hit contact on the first ball, it is possible that the thin-hit tangent-line judgement technique will result in the wrong answer or rare occasion. But the "wrong answer" is the "right answer" if no super slow motion video replay is available. I know this is a tough one to accept, but I think it is a necessary evil (unless people use their smartphones for slo-mo video, or unless tournament organizers install high-speed cameras above every table for video-replay review).
This an interesting question. Is it better to call the foul when 99 percent of the time it is correct but 1 percent of the time it’s not a foul, or is it better to say “on thin hits like this I cannot rule out a good hit so I can’t call a foul”?
One could argue that regulation 25 supports the latter.
25. REFEREE UNCERTAINTY
If the referee cannot determine whether a player fouled, the shot will be considered legal.
It’s kinda like the accidental miscue ruling. Even though we know that the vast majority of accidental miscues involve the CB hitting the shaft, we can’t say so with certainty because in rare instances there is no contact. So it’s not called a foul unless the contact with the shaft is clear.