BRIDGE and STROKE LENGTH “Best Practices” - Podcast with Dr. Dave and Nic Barrow

FYI, I just posted a new podcast video with Nic Barrow that discusses “best practices” and tradeoffs related to bridge length and stroke length, including the warm-up or feather strokes and the final backswing. Check it out:


Contents:
  • 0:00 - Intro
  • 3:19 - Podcast
  • ---- 3:54 - short bridge advantages
  • ---- 4:57 - short bridge disadvantages
  • ---- 5:28 - long bridge advantages
  • ---- 8:40 - low bridge concerns
  • ---- 12:54 - warm-up and feather strokes
  • ---- 16:14 - tip position and aim check
  • ---- 19:26 - summary
  • 20:57 - More Info
Supporting Resources:
As always, I look forward to your feedback, comments, questions, complaints, and requests.

Enjoy!

What do you guys think about lots of small feather strokes vs. holding the cue still while verifying tip contact point and cue alignment?

Team USA and the future of the Mosconi

... and yet the only player that has been talked up for Mosconi by a WNT commentator all year is a thirty-nine year old. I don't think they have figured it out yet.
The only young American player worth talking up for the Mosconi was Lukas Fracasso-Verner. He was third in ranking points until he got hurt. JJ and Frost did, in fact, talk him up a bit in commentary on Table 1 this year.

Yet given a choice, I would have taken Bergman over Lukas if the goal is to try to win now. He is simply a better player. If Lukas comes back from injury and gets back in pre-injury form, he will get talked about next year.

Player captains was, quite simply, one more step in the direction of validating the claim of many that the Mosconi selection process is not always a meritocracy.
Frazer was surprisingly emphatic on the Boomer and Freezer show that player-captains was a failure. Boyes has been even more critical for some time now.

Reading between the lines, I don't think the move was part of some grand strategy. MR was pinching pennies. Frazer said it had been her view it was better to spend Mosconi money on players instead of coaches. I bet MR probably gave Woodward and Shaw smaller captaincy fees than they would have paid to coaches.

Pennywise, pound-foolish, as it turned out. Sky was a disaster as coach and the event became even less compelling.

... and yet the only player that has been talked up for Mosconi by a WNT commentator all year is a thirty-nine year old. I don't think they have figured it out yet.
You forget too soon. Shane Woolford was added to the Mosconi team in 2023 when he was 23 or 24. He acquitted himself fairly well, but he's been a sporadic attendee at WNT events since 2024. Wolford didn't even play in this year's U.S. Open.

Can't talk about youngsters who don't perform. In any case, Frazer has talked up Hayn Ernest and Gavin Mathew this year and done selfies for social media, but it's too soon for her to be giving them lots of buzz given their young age.

Matchroom has had no trouble talking up AJ Manas, Albert Januarta and Felix Fogel. How come? They have the talent to warrant it.

This has not really been an issue for Team Europe, as you are fully aware. Their teams have been stacked with top players, but to be fair, young guys who've gotten on the team have been automatic qualifiers. The wild card picks since 2020 have been veterans.

Funny pic/gif thread...

Where I last lived in South Eastern Montana , I did have a black bear run through my yard in the town I was living in .
A friend of mine who lives 15 miles out of that same town had a small black bear that was hanging around his house causing trouble , it vanished and he was walking out to his barn and found even larger bear tracks in the dirt , yes you're correct a grizzly moved in taking over where the much smaller black bear left off .
Can you say wild game travel corridor ???? He's certain the grizzly moved along to greener pastures so to speak !

So don't let anyone convince you that grizzly bears need complete and total wilderness areas to survive which is a joke !
As they no longer fear humans like they once did .

Thoughts on players who seemingly take Zero practice strokes, before shooting / final follow through?

i’ll preface by saying you’re a good player and i am not, so these questions are genuine and not some kind of attack.

do you NOT adjust aim or stroke anyway?

i use LD, parallel english and i know i bridge further up than the pivot point on my shaft.

every single shot, before i even get down, i think i am adjusting my aim or stroke depending on what kind of ball i intend to hit.

deflection isnt much of a concern for the most part and really only seems to come up on long slow spin shots. i grew up on maple so these shots just kind of take me back and i seem to aim accordingly.

is there some kind of magical combination of mechanics and cues that allows you to just straight up not correct for squirt and swerve?
Nope. it's kind of funny. I've told this story many times, because I didn't believe it was possible. Growing up I was always a feel player, you feel where you need to aim and with experience, you make the shot or you don't.

This is sometime in 1999. I was at a place in Riverside Ca called shooters. At the time the GM there was like Efren's best friend, a guy by the name of Alex. He ended up opening his own room in Rancho Cucamonga called Stixx. So Efren came in often, whenever he was in the states. So I'm practicing and in walks Efren and starts practicing on the table next to me.

He was shooting this shot that was insane to me at the time. The 8 and the cb are at one end of the table dead straight about a 1/16" off the rail. The nine is on the rail on the other end of the table. He proceeds to shoot the 8 with top right and shoots it dead into the pocket on a table with 4.25" pockets, and sends the cueball down table with perfect shape on the 9. He does this like ten times in a row.

So I ask, how in the hell are you putting that much $h1t on the ball and still being accurate?

Alex translates, well answers for him really, saying, just aim normal, like center ball and rotate over for the amount of english you want.

I thought about this and said, to myself, not to Efren lol, there's no way, he's gotta be compensating subconsciously.

Now fast forward three years. I'm in the Navy, I'm playing all the time (because I was intelligence and when we were in port we didn't really do anything) and a really good player out of San Diego was talking while I was practicing, and I over hear him. His name was Chip Klein. He starts talking to someone and I see him describing what Efren described.

Long story short, even though it was EFREN REYES saying it, I didn't listen, or even try to use BHE for 3 years.

I've used it ever since...and learned a lot more about it, like the fact that you need to bridge at the cue's pivot point. But remember, everyone taught back then that you should bridge at 8-10 inches and that is the natural pivot point for standard hard rock maple, so for most people even without knowing about the pivot point, BHE would work.

Now, it works for the vast majority of shots, obviously if you hit too soft, then swerve is a bigger factor, etc, etc. But there's no reason to guess or compensate manually for side spin.

You need to try and minimize swerve, so you should elevate and lower your bridge for follow and draw, but for the majority of shots, it works without any other compensation.

Chalk gate at the open !!!!

Well think a little harder. When you chalk and any excess gets onto your hands, if you're holding the cue with that hand, it will remain stationary. If that's your bridge hand, the shaft will be sliding against your hand and the hand will be rubbing against the table. So there's a greater likelihood of the chalk getting on the cloth and on your cue...

If I ever stop wearing a glove again, I'll take a picture of my hand after a session to show you the difference.
I bet when you don't wear a glove the area between your ring finger and middle finger get the dirtiest with chalk. Even when my bridge hand looks clean I look between those 2 fingers and they are covered in chalk.

Chalk gate at the open !!!!

You're ambidextrous. Very cool.
I think ambidextrous means you do everything equally well with both hands, he does some things righty, and some lefty, I am the same way. I write, bat, golf left handed but I throw and shoot pool right handed. I don't think that is ambidextrous, its just effed up. The only thing I have found easier is talking on the phone while writing, I hold the phone in my right hand while writing left handed, most people hold the phone with the same hand they write with. :)

Chalk gate at the open !!!!

So I have a unique problem. Most players switch their cue to the opposite hand and chalk with their playing hand. I play left handed. I eat left handed and I write and draw left handed. Almost everything else I do right handed. I throw a ball, bowl, bat, do just about everything right handed. So I chalk right handed. I always wondered why other people's hands don't get as chalked up messy as mine until I was watching someone who played right handed set their cue in the opposite hand and chalk with their right hand. I thought that was so weird.

Then I realized I was the odd duck, but it makes for a messy hand and table, it's unavoidable. It's also why I never needed a glove, I was constantly chalking my fingers.
I chalk with my bridge hand too. I throw and shoot pool right handed but do most other things left handed.

Filter

Back
Top