jayman said:

It wasn't broken, But I'm glad they fixed it.

Click to expand...

That, sir...is a hilarious statement.

Can you click the header of the name column and make the data resort as per the clicked header?

Sounding a lot like work up in hrrre.

Badpenguin said:

Jesus man, he said "practice sets". It is basically exhibition matches. Why so damn serious?

Click to expand...

Agree, I would happily hand him hundreds all day to play him some banks and pick his brain. Only in pool would their be a discussion about this as the pros are much more available. In probably every other sport in the world people would be tripping over themselves to pay much more than $100 to play with a world champion

Describing one of our "unlucky locals"... "That boy could fall into a barrel of titties and come up sucking his thumb."

i find myself in the middle here, i would play but not without a spot where i could have a chance. also what's the point for fedor to play even with a 600 player, he'll have no pressure, how is that good practice for derby? i get big spot 1p is a bit goofy/different playing wise, but that's how tight he plays anyway

Bummer but yeah I dig. You made a decent comeback and I thought you might get him.

The commentators better stick to commentating.

Using a binomial probability table, one finds that these are the likelihoods that two players of equal skill will play eight racks and that either one of them will win exactly X racks:

x=0 .0078
X=1 .0625
x=2 .2188
x=3 .4375
x=4 .2734

Hence, the chance of eight consecutive matches finishing 6-2 are ,2188 raised to the eight power, or 0.000005252650942, so the odds against it happening are a bit over 190,000 to 1.

bump

snooker players use elk master a lot and they don´t shape it often... it goes flat then..