Made of weapons grade titanium dustSign me up for low-deflection chalk...
I am using the pagulayan Alex gave me. But I’m not short of a lifetime supply of chalks…I'll stick to the Pagulayan, by the time I'll go through the 4 pieces that I have, we'll probably have new tech that does not requires chalk...
The cue in question is definitely not a copy. It was a well known maker, we just can’t remember who it was.
They are not really comparable. One is a individual sport and one is a direct competive sport like tennis or boxing.
They both use balls but that is about it.
The shape is mathematically optimized for minimal production waste while still curbing static ownership.25$ and 40$ for two apparentlyI’d sell you HC for $10 + shipping
Constantly dumbfounded by the new colour, new shape, new ‘tech’ people lap up in this game
Anyway, the racks were certainly inconsistent, I’ll agree with you there. I’m sure the stripes were told to do it “in a timely manner” or I imagine they were anyway. Not to mention nobody can rack nearly as well as the players can themselves. And yeah that rack they used is likely trash but I think it’s the least of the problems because a good racker can overcome it(especially with clean new balls on new cloth) given the inclination to do so and the time.
They broke standard far more often than second ball. And I’d wager that 0 of the second ball breaks were the “pinned at the top rail” ones. Cue ball rarely leaves the racking end when you hit the second ball.I didn’t say the CB being pinned was directly caused by the bad racks. I said it was a result of what they had to DO on the break because of the racks.
With the top 6 balls frozen most pro players would break head ball square to make one or both balls behind the head ball in the side and squat the CB. Yes, the CB can get kicked back but if it doesn’t you are centre table.
With the second ball cut break collisions with the CB are always going to happen.