John Schmidt runs 820

There is a huge difference on the mental side of things when you are clean or think you are clean and when you know that when the video is reviewed it will show fouls.

You lay a six by six on the ground and dozens of people can walk it. Put the beam 200 feet in the air and very few can walk it. The pressure grows with every rack, tremendously more approaching a record. It's almost funny, they are fighting for every ball approaching a record. Once they think they have broken a record they may run another handful of racks almost effortlessly, the pressure is gone.

When I was a pup I cared nothing for golf, still don't. I would be riveted to the screen for the last few shots when two or three golfers were tied. Fifty thousand or more difference in payout for each place even back then. That was exciting!

That is why the videos when these people are trying to market high runs sell poorly, I believe. We already know how the story ends.

Hu
a very fumbly 820

820 nonetheless. Waiting for higher standards and screw the number. 350 on 4" holes for starters. No contact penalties maybe no penalties at all. Like racing. Players might go for it. Come. Get loose. Post a number. Long live Lou Butera....

:ROFLMAO:

Thoroughbred Tips

I don’t know about this. I would be very curious to know if an average player, a top amateur or a pro could identify the brand of tip (among the good traditional layered pigskin tips of the same hardness) based on feel, CB action etc. especially if they couldn’t see the tip.

People swear that different joints “hit different”. I have a recollection that someone did a test years ago where they taped over the joint and the players were terrible at identifying the joint type - wood to wood, fibre, steel, etc.

I’m not saying some people (especially at the high end of ability) couldn’t pick out their own tip type, but I would not be shocked if most could not.
I don’t think that anyone can pick up a brand in a blind test.
But any decent player can tell in a blind test what feels good to their preference.
It might very well be more than one tip and that’s fine.
But I would like to know what are those tips that felt better for me so I’ll know what to get and use.
A basic test such as this will be just a starting point, as the tip needs to perform over time and how much time to see it’s value.
For me a good tip not just feels great during one session, it needs to hold for at least 6 moths of long play (about 10 hours a week), it needs to feel consistent during that time even as it being trimmed down by shaping over that period of time.
Some top brands that used to be that good and consistent are not anymore in my option and not worth their price.

At 1/3 of the price, I will be happy for a 3 months consistency.

Thoroughbred Tips

That's a weird response...
I'm not a 700 player and I don't know who are those weird players that you know... but I can feel a difference in feedback and performance between tip as I'm sure you can as well and so any other semi decent players.

wouldn't you like to know the tip that feels and perform better for you and make sure to continue using it? I know that I would.

I don’t know about this. I would be very curious to know if an average player, a top amateur or a pro could identify the brand of tip (among the good traditional layered pigskin tips of the same hardness) based on feel, CB action etc. especially if they couldn’t see the tip.

People swear that different joints “hit different”. I have a recollection that someone did a test years ago where they taped over the joint and the players were terrible at identifying the joint type - wood to wood, fibre, steel, etc.

I’m not saying some people (especially at the high end of ability) couldn’t pick out their own tip type, but I would not be shocked if most could not.

Break Stats -- 2026 World 8-Ball Championship, April 2026

Here's a comparison of stats for the matches I tracked for the World 8-Ball events of 2022 (244 games), 2023 (254 games), 2024 (204 games), 2025 (223 games), and 2026 (205 games) in that order left to right.

The only differences I'm aware of in rules or equipment are: (1) the Predator table was an ARC model in 2025, whereas it was an Apex model the other four years; (2) the corner pocket mouth was 4⅛" this year, whereas it was 4¼" the other four years; and (3) the cloth this year was a new Predator Simonis cloth, whereas it was Predator Arcadia cloth the other 4 years.

• Successful breaks -- 57%, 49%, 53%, 49%, 46%​
• Breaker won game -- 59%, 53%, 58%, 52%, 50%​
• B&R games on all breaks -- 42%, 37%, 37%, 29%, 25%​
• B&R games on successful breaks -- 73%, 76%, 69%, 60%, 55%​
• Games ending in 1 inning -- 77%, 78%, 73%, 67%, 65%​
• Games ending in the 2nd inning -- 19%, 15%, 20%, 22%, 20%​
• Games going beyond the 2nd inning -- 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 15%​
• Runouts by the player at the table following the break -- 67%, 70%, 63%, 59%, 55%​
• First player to make a ball after the break won the game in that same inning -- 71%, 73%, 69%, 62%, 60%​
• First player to make a ball after the break won the game in a later inning -- 7%, 5%, 7%, 16%, 11%​
• First player to make a ball after the break won the game (any inning) -- 79%, 78%, 76%, 78%, 71%​
• Games per missed shot (approx.) -- 2.9, 2.9, 2.3, 2.0, 1.7​
• Games per foul -- 6.8, 8.5, 8.5, 8.3, 5.9​
• Games with one or more safeties -- 8%, 9%, 10%, 15%, 15%​
• Games (excl. B&Rs) with one or more safeties -- 14%, 14%, 16%, 22%, 20%​

very interesting, that's quite a drop in performance.

Break Stats -- 2026 World 8-Ball Championship, April 2026

I know it doesn't seem to be the popular opinion, but 8-ball is my favorite game to do commentary. And I know it sounds bold, but top amateur players know better how to play 8-ball better than the pros. The pros execute so well that clear mistake in pattern play and percentage play are masked. If amateur players tried some of weird patterns these pros do, they'd never get there. I guess I"m saying that professional 8-ball tournaments deserve better commentary to make the whole experience better.
Couldn’t agree more. Often when I’m watching several of the top guys I disagree with the paths they choose to take but it doesn’t matter when they execute as well as they do. BUT once in awhile. I liken it to straight pool in that way. Picking apart a rack is an art but you can still get it done most of the time just by being incredibly skilled.

We need more 8 ball, not less. It is Shane’s favorite game afterall.

Thoroughbred Tips

actually over the years ive had many tips and after shooting with them for a short time they all are just fine.
thats me you might be more particular and so be it. we are all different.

i play with many different sticks, balls, etc, tables. and just adjust to them even if i dont like them. its all the same for both parties.

and its true most very good players just care for a hard tip or a medium one. not a certain brand.
all i care if it holds chalk.
Thanks for reading the lengthy post in the hybrid shaft thread. If you're curious about what I'm building and the advancements I believe I've come up with please call me pretty much any evening. 610.605.7318 is my cell number. I'll happily discuss my project. This weekend I'm at the Super Billiards Expo, in and out but certainly didn't hesitate to call. Have a terrific evening.
Vince

Thoroughbred Tips

ive had lots of different tips but one thing ive found on all of them, the ball seems to go in the direction the tip hits it.

and almost all of the 700 plus players i know have no idea what brand of tip is on their multiple shafts. so i cant find out what a good tip is that makes you play well.
That's a weird response...
I'm not a 700 player and I don't know who are those weird players that you know... but I can feel a difference in feedback and performance between tip as I'm sure you can as well and so any other semi decent players.

wouldn't you like to know the tip that feels and perform better for you and make sure to continue using it? I know that I would.

Why is the APA so frowned upon?

the world is one where apa organizes tournaments. it wasn't true doub elim. in the winners bracket final it was all or nothing. the loser is out and does not get a chance in the losers bracket. so nobody wanted to play the team that was stacked with 3 players over 650 fargo. they wanted to go to the losers bracket where there was also a trip to vegas that was way easier to win (one on the winners side and one on the losers side). on the winners side it was an almost guaranteed loss against the stacked team...

my team (who was the second best team in the entire league other than the stacked team) got to be the lucky "winners" to get to the final of the winners bracket because nobody wanted to be there. even though our team is good it was really no match. fargo stats put us at about a 9 percent chance of winning. so we only had one loss and then out of the tournament. every other team got to take a loss and go to the losers bracket but us.

It was by far the dumbest playoffs I've ever played in.

I should add the team that dumped on us did in fact go on to win the trip to vegas on the losers bracket. so yeah
If you're speaking in FargoRate language, you shouldn't even be in an APA league. Quit, and go gamble.

Filter

Back
Top