Are the tips of the pockets not considered like a rail?
- By gregcantrall
- Main Forum
- 24 Replies
Cool, I wasn't sure if the side pocket dividing one rail required another rail contact.That would still count as rail contact.
Cool, I wasn't sure if the side pocket dividing one rail required another rail contact.That would still count as rail contact.
C'mon, man!I imagine anyone winning stuff was no stranger to itty bitty pockets. There is probably a relative deluge of ready and able now. This might up the requirements into the fail zone for the old champs.
That would still count as rail contact.Was it frozen to the first point and driven to the second?
Color me confused.Who, in their right mind, would want to do that?
Lou Figueroa
The wing ball was going every time, so the TD moved the spot up higher. (has nothing to do with a scratch on the break. This was before Texas Express rules, so on a scratch on break, any balls made were spotted, and if the 1 was above the headstring, it was spotted, BIH in the kitchen )Why is there 2 spots on the table where they are racking??
Login to view embedded media
He used Chandivert Champion tips. I sold some of them to a cue maker friend a few years ago. I think he was he was restoring a a G.S. cue. I still have a few laying around. They were a fairly soft tip. Sort of hard to describe actually. I put some on some of my old Adam cues. they were prone to mushrooming but played very nice.I would like to know if Gus always used the same tip or if it was customer preference. If he used the same kind, what was it? Thanks
Big Al
I just realized I have at least 3 versions of the M-15.Great looking cues, and nice photos. I really love that series of Mali Cues. Green label Malis like yours are known as the M-series and they were produced, from 1984-1985 and they are beautiful playing cues. I have bought and sold many of them overs, like you I love them, the craftsmanship in these cues was fantastic at the time, and they were made in the United States at the Mali Factory. The Mali factory in the United States was open from 1961 until 2001, all cues after 2001 are Chinese imports, and they are unfortunately poor quality, unlike your cues.
Here is the my favorite M Model, it is a M-15 the most expensive cue the came out of the M-series like your cues
View attachment 845985
View attachment 845986
Here are some very nice ones of the same series with inlay on EBay.
1. https://www.ebay.com/itm/1677176451...d=link&campid=5335988529&toolid=20001&mkevt=1.
2. This cue was the first cue in the series. https://www.ebay.com/itm/3762714907...d=link&campid=5335988529&toolid=20001&mkevt=1
The pocket liners are also part of the rail, so it's possible to "get a cushion" without ever hitting rail cloth.hmm, i think the tips of the pockets are a rail
Nice!The bottom cue is ebony and maple.
The top cue is ebony and camphor burl.
The middle cue is cocobolo and sindora burl.
Yes, it does count as cushion contact. I think you must have missed some other aspect of the situation. Video link/timestamp?I watched a match recently where Roberto Gomez hit the cue ball into the object ball, and drove it slowly into both the corner pocket tips, attempting to bury the cueball behind another ball. The object ball bounced between the corner pocket tips then back out onto the table a little ways. Then Josh Filler proceeded to pick up the cueball for a foul, taking ball in hand.
So, I guess that doesn't count as 'driving a ball into a rail'?