its all what you are used to and what you prefer. neither is better. all it is is personal opinion.

at one house i have an old ventura 2 brunswick 9 foot. it is a high quality table that looks furniture like besides looks beautiful.
would not trade it out for any other table anywhere. and would recommend it for most any player for his house if he can stand decent sized pockets.

bpeacock said:

@dr_dave is this a foul or no? It looked good to me, but ref said no good.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=314&href=https://www.facebook.com/reel/1246230760988379/&show_text=false&width=560&t=0

Click to expand...

i know the frozen rule. but it looked totally crazy. it's very hard for me to say it looked good, even if it was. wild.

must surely have been frozen. if not, quinten is a madman

Cartune said:

Sad but true



Why does CSI not have representation on this forum, if they do, why do they never respond to criticism or posts about how they handle these situations...except like a small child, and ban them for expressing their OWN views. Pathetic

Click to expand...

If I remember correctly, decades ago Ozzy posted here. Some members complained about the CSI PPV stream , he responded poorly knocking some members and folks here went down hard on him. I think after that he quit never posted (though he may have posted under other username). He deserved it. He may be nice guy to his friends family but came across as a douche here

I also like saying thanks for racking but you even suck at that

Jason<----always making new friends

I shook hands with a guy after a match and he said, “thanks for the lesson”
Kind of cold but all I could come up with was, “no charge “
We had a few beers after that so all was good!

single elim starts tomorrow right?

Crasher said:

Publicly disparaging the table sponsor, management, and arbitration?

shucks, I don't know, what would you call it?

Click to expand...

I think dirty laundry relates more to personal private matters. All of what you mention is work/ business related

bpeacock said:

@dr_dave is this a foul or no? It looked good to me, but ref said no good.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=314&href=https://www.facebook.com/reel/1246230760988379/&show_text=false&width=560&t=0

Click to expand...

Pongers called over the ref and he said something after inspecting the balls. I have to assume he called it frozen or Pongers wouldn’t have shot through the balls.

If so, shouldn’t be a foul (nothing in the WNT Rules overrule the WPA rule on this). My only guess as to Marcel is that he might have said he can’t overrule the referee. WNT rules say:

“If Table Referees are in charge of the matches, there shall be no right for either player to ask for a second opinion; the referees are in sole charge of the matches and their decision is final”.

bpeacock said:

@dr_dave is this a foul or no? It looked good to me, but ref said no

Click to expand...

That was Quinten Pongers' shot against Glont. If the balls had been declared frozen, there was no foul in the contact itself. Shooting into a frozen ball is legal. The speed is irrelevant.

Free For those who have nothing better to watch

Table 1
Login to view embedded media
Table 2
Login to view embedded media
Table 3
Login to view embedded media
Table 4
Login to view embedded media
Table 5
Login to view embedded media

@dr_dave is this a foul or no? It looked good to me, but ref said no good.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?height=314&href=https://www.facebook.com/reel/1246230760988379/&show_text=false&width=560&t=0

6 days for this? they should just televise last 2 days and last 32 single elimination and spare us the boredom. Who wants to watch slow matches , lots of dead money massacre first few days, Joke is MR press release announcing so called World Number 1 Gorst thrashing 9-0 his dead money opponent like it is big deal

Login to view embedded media