crack-man,
Sorry, I can't help here. The issue of sanctioning is very complex. The few times it has been explained to me, I was left with the impression that it is often VERY arbitrary, depending on the decision of the board in the individual case. Sometimes it is per event, sometimes per player. Usually the fee is nominal; but if many players are involved (ie. CW's Mezz classic), they may decide to charge the promoter per player, making it impossible to afford.
Thank you for the info. I was hoping it wasn't so complex but was figuring it might be. Considering the current economy and the difficulty the WPBA has had in securing tournament venues, I'm a little perplexed at them making it more difficult, if not impossible for their players to be seen and generate more publicity.
I don't want to speak out of place so please correct me if I'm wrong. I was told that they're struggling and have been looking to more pool rooms to hold events because they've lost some of the venues they've played in the past.
In trying times people need to make concessions. A group of friends that are still employed at my former employer agreed to take a 10% paycut at the first of the yr in order to help the company and maintain their jobs. Now they're hearing that they might end up losing their job after all because the union at another facility voted not to accept a 5% pay cut. I would rather take a 5% pay cut than a 100% pay cut. Maybe the WPBA should look at it that way. There are some that might view the match up between these two young ladies and enjoy it enough to go check out the next WPBA event in their area that might not have come about if they hadn't seen them on the live stream.
I apologize for getting off track. Best of rolls to both of the ladies and I hope we're able to watch this match on the live stream.