Pro level. Why settle for less?
Are there any concrete, clear definitions for these 'rating' things?
It all seems a bit random to me. Especially when you see things like A+, AA, AA+, etc.
-Tim
I've always agreed with this following definition, except for the part about A players and Open player always stringing racks together. It depends entirely on how the table is breaking, and how good a breaker the player is.
D- Player
>will not run a rack
>average run is about 3 balls
>with ball in hand, will get out from the 7, one out of 3 times
>rarely plays a successful safe
C-Player
>will probably run one rack, but usually not more than one
>avg. run is 3 to 5 balls
>with ball in hand, will get out from the 7, two out of 3 times
>mixed results when playing safe
>inning ends due to botched position, missed shot or attempting a safe.
B-Player
>Able to run 1 to 3 racks
>avg. run is 5-7 balls
>with ball in hand will get out form the 5, 2 out of 3 times
>most of the time a "B" player will play a "safety" which maybe hit easily 2 out of 3 times
>a typical inning will end with a missed shot, a fair safety, or a won game
A-Player
>will string 2 to 3 racks
>avg. ball run, 7-9
>with ball in hand, will be out from the 3 ball, 2 out of 3 times
>typical inning will end with a well executed safety or a win.
OPEN-Players
>average 8+ balls
>string racks together more than once in a match
>is a threat to run out from every ball, from every position, every inning
>typical inning will end in excellent safety or win
Pro level. Why settle for less?
Out of curiosity for the people choosing pro, it's your end goal correct? In other words your aiming to become a professional level player at some point in your development? If so, excellent. If not, I'm interested in what people are trying to achieve.
"I thought this was a knitting forum? This isn't the thread I thought it was"
Hmmm... I think this should have read:
- I thought this was a sewing forum? This isn't the thread I thought it was
IMO,
Fred <~~~ aspiring to make it out of bed in time
I don't know if this has been done before as a poll. I'm curious from a statistical standpoint what level players aspire to, if any at all (which is fine).
I'm not talking pipe dreams, only answer pro if it is a goal you are aiming for and feel that you can attain. In otherwords not, "I could get there if I had more time" or "It'd be nice if I could play like"
I'll use what I believe is the New York system Pro, Open, A, B, C, D. I believe more people subscribe to this understanding than not.
I'd love to get to the point where I can string 5 racks of 9-ball on a good day. Like, not just doing it once because I got 5 spectacular breaks in a row, but getting to the point where a very good opponent in the chair starts to feel concerned about how many racks I'll run before I let him back to the table. I'd consider this level to be "open", so that's what I voted for.
If you're the kind of player who might come out with a 5-pack at any time, you have a chance to beat the best in the world. Probably not often, but you're never in a match that you don't have a chance to win. That would be great.
-Andrew
I've always agreed with this following definition, except for the part about A players and Open player always stringing racks together. It depends entirely on how the table is breaking, and how good a breaker the player is.
D- Player
>will not run a rack
>average run is about 3 balls
>with ball in hand, will get out from the 7, one out of 3 times
>rarely plays a successful safe
C-Player
>will probably run one rack, but usually not more than one
>avg. run is 3 to 5 balls
>with ball in hand, will get out from the 7, two out of 3 times
>mixed results when playing safe
>inning ends due to botched position, missed shot or attempting a safe.
B-Player
>Able to run 1 to 3 racks
>avg. run is 5-7 balls
>with ball in hand will get out form the 5, 2 out of 3 times
>most of the time a "B" player will play a "safety" which maybe hit easily 2 out of 3 times
>a typical inning will end with a missed shot, a fair safety, or a won game
A-Player
>will string 2 to 3 racks
>avg. ball run, 7-9
>with ball in hand, will be out from the 3 ball, 2 out of 3 times
>typical inning will end with a well executed safety or a win.
OPEN-Players
>average 8+ balls
>string racks together more than once in a match
>is a threat to run out from every ball, from every position, every inning
>typical inning will end in excellent safety or win
I have had to work a full time and a part time job since I was 21. I'm 50 this past April. For 10 of those years, I worked a full time job and two part time jobs. I had a growing family to support. I don't regret taking care of them.
But, in Nov 2006, I quit my part time job and only worked full time. Always practiced when time permitted. Played since I was 11 so I had thousands of hours at the table. But the practice and playing really picked up after my schedule freed up some. My goal was to be competitive in any senior competition. I can honestly say that I was never playing so good in my life as I had in 2007-2008. I wanted to play at Grady's in one of his events.
Then the back surgery in April 2009 followed by that infection that put me back in the hospital. I was basically on my back for 6 months. And I have not been able to hit one ball since. Can't bend over enough and I refuse to shoot standing straight up ala Alfredo DeOro!
I hope to someday be able to run a rack of 8 ball and 9 ball again. My high run in 14.1 was only 41 but I was trying to up that by specifically practicing 14.1, which is one of my favorite games. Now, I'd be thrilled to run 41 ever again.
Once I get loosened up some, I do intend to work hard at pool again. It's the funnest (word?) thing to practice!