All of this trumped up reasons, since Jeanette actually passed everyone"s silly reasons, now what? She gets to be considered right?
Let's see, to answer the trumped up false reasoning she:
Bet her own money - check
Bet at least 10 dimes of her own (that seems to be the Ricky Byrd number) - check
She gave weight - check
She made games - check
Additionally, any of these silly reasons (which to be very clear have no bearing on who can be considered for the award) would be ridiculous to use as scrutiny for other winners. For example, Chris Bartram. His year wouldn't have passed many of your complaints. Who would deny his merit for the award.?
Bottom line: she was in action and entertaining. She's been in action every year I've seen her at the DCC. EVERY YEAR. The only difference this year was she happened to stand out more from an entertainment perspective. Same as Scooter in his year. Same as Bartram in his year. Same as Cliff in his year...
Fred <~~~ it's a pretty simple concept without any politics
Fred
Its not politics, it's sexism. I wasn't there so all I know is what I was able to surmise from having my face pressed to the screen for both the TAR and Accustats streams (thanks for your fine work BTW) full time and from what I saw Jeanette Lee goes beyond simply qualifying for consideration. She ought to be given the award.
I don't get what it is about accepting female players. I turned a friend of mine who plays about like me, maybe a little better, on to the J Lee vs Tedder match and he was telling me "we" would beat her handily and I was way wondering which we he was referring top because J Lee would pound the "us" I thought he and me were.
Anyway, the action matches I saw of hers were very entertaining, pretty well played, for more cash than I've ever bet, with plenty of rail action and interest, and she did that every night. Louie would be proud (RIP you crazy crazy talented big hearted man).
Thanks
Kevin
Last edited: