Actually, it was probably me that you continually see inviting the CTE guys to explore other [more precise] pocket-based cue sports, like snooker and Russian Pyramid, and see if they see any sign, any hint, of any sort of pivot-based aiming. And they won't. The very notion of pivoting your cue goes against the foundation of these more precise pocket-based cue sports. As other posters have said, and a play on that old real estate joke, "it's all about foundation, foundation, foundation."
Sean against CTE
From sean:
Exactly! And what does the comment, "CTE... ... works well in snooker" really mean? That he potted a couple balls? Tell him to move the object ball back from the pocket, deeper into the center of the table, and move the cue ball back away from that object ball. Then try CTE on that shot -- see how "exact" he is then...
Sounds like your against CTE.
No Dave, those two are NOT against CTE -- they were made in response to bloated marketing claims that were made about CTE. See? These are two perfect examples where you took something out of context from the post. *This* is what I'm getting at -- you are MISREADING what I'm writing, and not getting the gist of it. You are taking these as "anti-CTE" when in reality, I'm anti-the-bloated-marketing of the post those two were in response to. (And btw, you took *both* of these from the same thread in the snooker forum, a thread asking about whether CTE is used or taught in snooker [a topic I'd know about]. The answer was no. You already saw the plethora of responses in that thread -- many a lot more strongly worded and to the point than mine!)
Anyway, I'd already posted an apology to the OP and RonV for misusing the thread to initially make a [poorly timed] tongue-in-cheek attempt. And I don't want to continue further on this. This is not the thread for this. Again, I apologize to kaznj and RonV about my poor timing.
-Sean
Last edited: