I recently was in a local 9 ball turney and was paying attention to one of the players who made the wing ball on every rack he broke,I saw about 10 Is it magic ? or is there ways to set those racks to make balls
1
1
I recently was in a local 9 ball turney and was paying attention to one of the players who made the wing ball on every rack he broke,I saw about 10 Is it magic ? or is there ways to set those racks to make balls
1
I recently was in a local 9 ball turney and was paying attention to one of the players who made the wing ball on every rack he broke,I saw about 10 Is it magic ? or is there ways to set those racks to make balls
1
Actually a perfect rack does not mean you will make the wing ball...
Neither does a Magic Rack rack. I've seen plenty of wing balls missed using one.
The magic rack loads the balls by pushing them against each other.. In a perfect rack the balls are touching but the cloth holds them in place......
The magic rack creates potential energy because of the loading... This is why it makes a beginner look like he knows what he/she's doing when they break using it....... "Wing Ball Corner pocket" Wham!!!!
How would you explain a Sardo rack, which does the same thing without "holding" the balls in place?
Fact of the matter is, even without a perfect rack the wing ball can be made every time. Ask Joe Tucker.
The problem isn't any kind of racking device, it's the rack itself. The 9 ball rack is too easily manipulated, rigged, and easily read to give the breaker a definitive advantage if they know what they're looking at/for.
Sorry, Renfro. And anyone else that believes in "loading the rack". I call B.S. on it. I say Prove It! Until someone does, I say it's nonsense. I believe it was started by the better players as the only excuse they could come up with to argue against having a tight rack and not being able to rig the rack on lesser players. There is no evidence whatsoever that I have ever heard of, of any tests being done to verify the statement. A tight rack means the corner ball is wired if the rack is hit at an angle, and it also means that the 9 will stay in the rack area. If hit a little off of straight on, the back ball will hit the 9 and send it up towards a corner pocket. Exact same thing happens with a wooden rack on a new cloth while you can still get the balls all frozen.
You can measure any "loading" using your finger to push a ball out of the rack. It is a tiny amount, just a gentle brush. Very little more than if there is no magic rack in use. So if the balls roll any further than a regular rack where all balls are touching, there is some other reason.
As for directing the balls toward a pocket - the balls not on the perimeter aren't directed anywhere. They are sitting on the felt. The balls sitting in the little slots are directed towards the center of the rack by the magic rack (if in any direction), not outwards towards some pocket.
As for having something on the table during play, there is the foot spot. It's always there - so there is a precedent. You can usually remove the magic rack without disturbing a ball early in a game. Sometimes I get lazy and just leave it there. A few times I've noticed that as some random ball is almost stopped, its path is changed by the magic rack. But not much or often.
Mainly I think the magic rack demonstrates what lousy racks people are used to. Most people just didn't know how bad they were.
Actually a perfect rack does not mean you will make the wing ball...
The magic rack loads the balls by pushing them against each other.. In a perfect rack the balls are touching but the cloth holds them in place......
The magic rack creates potential energy because of the loading... This is why it makes a beginner look like he knows what he/she's doing when they break using it....... "Wing Ball Corner pocket" Wham!!!!
I do believe in the term "loading the rack". I like to call it "stacking the balls".
I think the burden of proof is on the new gadget in order for it to become standard. There is something really wrong here. Why is the new racking gadget still on the table during the shot? Isn't this the same thing as laying a cue stick under a rail during a shot so to direct any balls that hit the rail into the corner pocket?
Here we are leaving on the table while shooting, a template that influences the direction of the balls.
I do believe in the term "loading the rack". I like to call it "stacking the balls".
I think the burden of proof is on the new gadget in order for it to become standard. There is something really wrong here. Why is the new racking gadget still on the table during the shot? Isn't this the same thing as laying a cue stick under a rail during a shot so to direct any balls that hit the rail into the corner pocket?
Here we are leaving on the table while shooting, a template that influences the direction of the balls.
I have never seen a magic rack turn a ball and steer it into the corner pocket during a break, after which it is taken off the table. The edges of it point at a half diamond up the short rail anyway, not at the pocket.
JC