FTR, I played bumper pool too!!!:grin:
Maniac (I sucked at that also)
Rep to you anyway for bringing to bumper pool issue to the front page
FTR, I played bumper pool too!!!:grin:
Maniac (I sucked at that also)
I give 7 days to return a used cue in the same condition it was received.
Rep to you anyway for bringing to bumper pool issue to the front page
there has been zero mud-slinging!!!
Maniac
Rep to you anyway for bringing to bumper pool issue to the front page
Hello James,
It's Omega Billiards. :wink::smile:
Thank you for your business.
P.S: Just notice that FedEx will deliver your cue today.
So, what do you do IF the cue doesn't come back in the condition you shipped it in? Nix the refund? Send less money back than the buyer paid for it? Who sets the amount of what is right and decent and right to do in a case like this?
How this is handled can be as touchy as the refund/no refund debate.
This IS a good thread. One of the better ones that's been on the Main Forum lately. I am learning MUCH about the workings of the Wanted/For Sale forum. And........there has been zero mud-slinging!!!
Maniac
You actually can have a a far better opportunity to evaluate a cue you buy on the internet that you would at SBE if the internet cue comes with a suitable inspection period and a satisfaction guarantee. That's the point of what we are talking about.
and I'm saying you shouldn't get one...once you buy it it's yours as long it's not warped or have marks in it that the sellar didn't tell you about. Hit is irrelevant.
Love it.....didn't every kid have one of these.
Oh, wait....what was being discussed.
Kev, you gotta love AZ these days....
Do you mean to tell me that if two sellers are offering the same cue for the same money in the same condition and one seller is "as is" and the other is "satisfaction guaranteed" you would really prefer to deal with the as-is seller?
I think there really are different discussions being confused here.
Satisfaction and/or Accurate Representation.
Having recourse due to defect or misrepresentation is far different then accepting random open ended conditions of personal satisfaction or remorse.
This is why the standard in online retail has generally always been warranty return/exchange for defects and ad errors or returns minus shipping plus restocking fees for satisfaction/remorse.
That makes the most logical sense to me and I don't see any valid reason for it to be otherwise. (But you already knew I would say that)
I think there really are different discussions being confused here.
Satisfaction and/or Accurate Representation.
Having recourse due to defect or misrepresentation is far different then accepting random open ended conditions of personal satisfaction or remorse.
This is why the standard in online retail has generally always been warranty return/exchange for defects and ad errors or returns minus shipping plus restocking fees for satisfaction/remorse.
That makes the most logical sense to me and I don't see any valid reason for it to be otherwise. (But you already knew I would say that)