If you do most of the stuff you suggest I dont think you are playing 8 ball anymore. I also dont think for pros to play a game they have to play it on a table with three inch pockets to keep them from running out.
Why the hyperbole? 3 Inches?
The Fatboy rails were 4 1/8th, the balls are 2 1/4, so the pocket when using the Fatboy rails were 1 7/8th larger then the object ball.
The pockets were 1.8333... times as large as the object balls.
I know of noone, including myself, that asked for pockets tighter then the Fatboy rails. They were IMO perfect sized and cut pockets that played extremely true and balanced. The TAR rails, those were not the same, they played tight on rail shots due to the pocket angles and they were diminishing the product.
If you stick to the facts then the switch in pockets makes little sense, on the Fatboy rails SVB ran out huge packages against Alex, it was on those rails he had his 7 pack and 6 pack to close out day 1 and day 2, no hyperbole, just straight forward facts on how those pockets actually played for pro pool.
The solution to the ease of the TAR table now is simple, Fatboy has flat out offered his rails to you any time you want them, no reason to go changing the rules of the games to "fix" the ease that the table now creates. Go back to the Fatboy rails, get Glen to build you a truly identical set, they were perfect, the top pros played great on them and there was nothing gaffy about them at all unlike the TAR rails that replaced them.
All anyone has ever asked for is the Fatboy rails back, no hyperbole, no 3 inch pockets, just the 4 1/8th inch pockets back that worked so well, that played phenomenal, and that seperated the elite players from everyone else so nicely.