Sunday I started a thread in the " Pool Table and Accessories" section. It
went something like this:
The other day during a discussion in the forums I mentioned that I played on a 1971 Minnesota Fats pool table. Not everyone was impressed. Seems tables with Fats name from the 70's up until today were and are sold in department stores and they max out at $1300. We bought ours at a dealership that sold Fats tables exclusively. My dad paid $600 for it which when adjusted for inflation translates to $3460 today. Does anybody know anything about these tables that were sold at dealerships at that time?.........
A bunch of folks read the post but 0 replied so yesterday I started the same thread in the main forum. During this thread which started yesterday and is still going on as we speak I several times made the distinction between the department store models and the quality model that we own. I staunchly defended the quality of the table we owned. It's possible there was a misunderstanding there. I'm not a pool table expert. When I insisted it was quality table what I should have said is that I insist it was an expensive dealership bought model as opposed to a cheap department store model. in retrospect I realize that while all expensive dealership tables are supposed to be quality, what is supposed may not be the case and as I said, I'm not a pool table expert.
So; I'll stop using the word "quality" and will now staunchly defend that it was dealership sold and it was more expensive and therefore it was of supposed superior quality than the department store models. Similarly, Trek, Giant, and Cannondale bicycles are dealership sold, more expensive, and therefore of supposed superior quality than department store bicycles. I'm clarifying that I'm now changing my wording and from mow on I'll simply use the words "supposed superior quality."
Posters chiming in seemed to have no knowledge whatsoever of the supposed superior quality Fats tables. They had department store etched in their minds when Fats tables were mentioned and I kept insisting that quality Fats tables existed. Once again I should have insisted that supposed quality Fats tables existed. But I'm sure been if I had said that, they would have still have had department store etched in their minds. A few posters comceded there may have been expensive dealership Fats tables sold, but that they were of low quality. They gave no reasons. My perception was that they believed themselves to be highly knowledgeable about tables and if expensive, quality, dealership Fats tables existed, they would know about it. Since they didn't know about it, they must be of low quality
Mr.Bond from the Chicago Billiard Museum showed up. He said Fats was employed by a pool table manufacturing company in 1964. This company had a line of 30 tables ranging in price from $250 to $3000. This company began to slide downhill in 1982 and eventually went out of business.
Finally, a mechanic from this side of the aisle posted. He's the reason I am now using the phrase "supposed superior quality".........
So; if any of you folks are aware of the supposed superior quality Minnesota Fats tables, sold in dealerships around 1971, I'd appreciate your opinions on them. Thank you.
went something like this:
The other day during a discussion in the forums I mentioned that I played on a 1971 Minnesota Fats pool table. Not everyone was impressed. Seems tables with Fats name from the 70's up until today were and are sold in department stores and they max out at $1300. We bought ours at a dealership that sold Fats tables exclusively. My dad paid $600 for it which when adjusted for inflation translates to $3460 today. Does anybody know anything about these tables that were sold at dealerships at that time?.........
A bunch of folks read the post but 0 replied so yesterday I started the same thread in the main forum. During this thread which started yesterday and is still going on as we speak I several times made the distinction between the department store models and the quality model that we own. I staunchly defended the quality of the table we owned. It's possible there was a misunderstanding there. I'm not a pool table expert. When I insisted it was quality table what I should have said is that I insist it was an expensive dealership bought model as opposed to a cheap department store model. in retrospect I realize that while all expensive dealership tables are supposed to be quality, what is supposed may not be the case and as I said, I'm not a pool table expert.
So; I'll stop using the word "quality" and will now staunchly defend that it was dealership sold and it was more expensive and therefore it was of supposed superior quality than the department store models. Similarly, Trek, Giant, and Cannondale bicycles are dealership sold, more expensive, and therefore of supposed superior quality than department store bicycles. I'm clarifying that I'm now changing my wording and from mow on I'll simply use the words "supposed superior quality."
Posters chiming in seemed to have no knowledge whatsoever of the supposed superior quality Fats tables. They had department store etched in their minds when Fats tables were mentioned and I kept insisting that quality Fats tables existed. Once again I should have insisted that supposed quality Fats tables existed. But I'm sure been if I had said that, they would have still have had department store etched in their minds. A few posters comceded there may have been expensive dealership Fats tables sold, but that they were of low quality. They gave no reasons. My perception was that they believed themselves to be highly knowledgeable about tables and if expensive, quality, dealership Fats tables existed, they would know about it. Since they didn't know about it, they must be of low quality
Mr.Bond from the Chicago Billiard Museum showed up. He said Fats was employed by a pool table manufacturing company in 1964. This company had a line of 30 tables ranging in price from $250 to $3000. This company began to slide downhill in 1982 and eventually went out of business.
Finally, a mechanic from this side of the aisle posted. He's the reason I am now using the phrase "supposed superior quality".........
So; if any of you folks are aware of the supposed superior quality Minnesota Fats tables, sold in dealerships around 1971, I'd appreciate your opinions on them. Thank you.
Last edited: