That's great for people in this generation, but when you and SVB and all the rest of us are dead and buried no one is going to remember how good his break was or how much he dominated in long sets, they will look at the stats and numbers of major events he won, mostly on the world stage, and they will find him lacking in that one most important thing.
As Jay said, if you don't win the true majors you are not going to go down in history as one of those key players that defined their generation.
At the end of the day some people become the Moe Norman of a game while the others become Arnold Palmer or Jack Nicklaus. Moe almost became the best golfer that no one has ever heard of to play the game.
Can't really knock shane for a lack of a 'world' title, because IMO the
us open has enough foreign players to be considered one.
<snip>
PS to Celtic: You really feel the cream doesn't rise to the top in this format?
It's alternate break. The break is a specific skilled shot, like a spot shot (or if you want, a trick shot).
You can argue it's "too easy" or whatever. OK, fine.
But that just means when it's your turn to break, you have no excuse to miss the shot.
You must make the ball and if you didn't, you can't cry that it was bad luck.
So you should make something, not scratch, and control the 1 or at least be at the table
when the dust settles. No excuses in this format.
That's weird no one in the world wants to play him for money
If he doesn't win a major then he won't be recognized as one of the greats in the eyes of people that do not know too much about pool. But in the eyes of people that do know about pool he raised the bar.
I actually disagree that being a great money player is a better yardstick of skill than being a tournament champion. The very best players (like Shane and Buddy before him) can do both, win tournaments and win for the cash.
The fact is that winning any major tournament is a real test of skill and stamina. The ability to play good under pressure match after match cannot be minimized imo. Ask any of the top tournament players and see what they say about the pressure of playing Races to Eleven in a single elimination format. I think it's much harder to win a tournament like the current World 9-Ball Championship, than it is to win several money matches.
Bottom lime, it takes a lot of HEART to win one of these major tournaments, as even Donny will attest, as he had a close call a few years back in the U.S. Open, finishing third. The very best money player of my generation was Jack Cooney. He won more than the next ten guys combined. Will he go down in history as one of the all time greats, doubtful. Was he a great player, absolutely!
Just because a world beater does not beat the world every time does not mean that he is not a stone cold champion.
Yes, it's harder to beat the elite fields today than it was back in the day.
Nonetheless, a player can only be judged against his peers, and if Shane wants to demonstrate he's a cut above the players of this generation, he'll have to prove it by beating the most elite fields, which come in WPA World Championships.
The greats of this generation of players, Appleton, Immonen, Souquet, Hohmann, Orcullo, and Wu have all won a WPA World 9-ball championship, and it's time for Shane to stand up and be counted by winning one of his own.
Shane is a definite BCA Hall of Famer, but continued underachievement in WPA World Championship events will leave him outside the conversation of who is the best ever?
Wish him well, but no, he doesn't get a bad rap. He is a recognized superstar who has come up short all too often on the very biggest stages.
I think you put too much faith in odd format tournaments held on sometimes questionable equipment. The standard for me is US Opens. Despite all its troubles of late with pay issues the format, equipment and fields have been consistent for many years.
There is the little matter of total money won as well.
Of the players you listed Shane has played three of them in long format 10 ball races. He destroyed all of them. The WPA event thing is a valid criticism and one day he will get that monkey off his back. But to say he is somehow not in the same class as those you mention because he hasn't won a WPA event is pretty silly IMO.
I think you put too much faith in odd format tournaments held on sometimes questionable equipment. The standard for me is US Opens. Despite all its troubles of late with pay issues the format, equipment and fields have been consistent for many years.
There is the little matter of total money won as well.
Of the players you listed Shane has played three of them in long format 10 ball races. He destroyed all of them. The WPA event thing is a valid criticism and one day he will get that monkey off his back. But to say he is somehow not in the same class as those you mention because he hasn't won a WPA event is pretty silly IMO.
That's weird no one in the world wants to play him for money
I actually disagree that being a great money player is a better yardstick of skill than being a tournament champion. The very best players (like Shane and Buddy before him) can do both, win tournaments and win for the cash.
The fact is that winning any major tournament is a real test of skill and stamina. The ability to play good under pressure match after match cannot be minimized imo. Ask any of the top tournament players and see what they say about the pressure of playing Races to Eleven in a single elimination format. I think it's much harder to win a tournament like the current World 9-Ball Championship, than it is to win several money matches.
Bottom lime, it takes a lot of HEART to win one of these major tournaments, as even Donny will attest, as he had a close call a few years back in the U.S. Open, finishing third. The very best money player of my generation was Jack Cooney. He won more than the next ten guys combined. Will he go down in history as one of the all time greats, doubtful. Was he a great player, absolutely!
I think you put too much faith in odd format tournaments held on sometimes questionable equipment. The standard for me is US Opens. Despite all its troubles of late with pay issues the format, equipment and fields have been consistent for many years.
There is the little matter of total money won as well.
Of the players you listed Shane has played three of them in long format 10 ball races. He destroyed all of them. The WPA event thing is a valid criticism and one day he will get that monkey off his back. But to say he is somehow not in the same class as those you mention because he hasn't won a WPA event is pretty silly IMO.
If he doesn't win a major then he won't be recognized as one of the greats in the eyes of people that do not know too much about pool. But in the eyes of people that do know about pool he raised the bar.
Yes, it's harder to beat the elite fields today than it was back in the day.
Nonetheless, a player can only be judged against his peers, and if Shane wants to demonstrate he's a cut above the players of this generation, he'll have to prove it by beating the most elite fields, which come in WPA World Championships.
The greats of this generation of players, Appleton, Immonen, Souquet, Hohmann, Orcullo, and Wu have all won a WPA World 9-ball championship, and it's time for Shane to stand up and be counted by winning one of his own.
Shane is a definite BCA Hall of Famer, but continued underachievement in WPA World Championship events will leave him outside the conversation of who is the best ever?
Wish him well, but no, he doesn't get a bad rap. He is a recognized superstar who has come up short all too often on the very biggest stages.
Below is the payouts from last years open... Would you consider this field elite???
1st Shane Van Boening $25,000
2nd Dennis Orcollo $15,000
3rd Alex Pagulayan $10,000
4th Efren Reyes $6,000
5th/6th Ronnie Alcano $4,000
5th/6th Jose Parica $4,000
7th/8th Jun Lin Chang $3,000
7th/8th Darren Appleton $3,000
*7th/8th Deathball $3,000
9th/12th Neils Feijen $2,000
9th/12th Jayson Shaw $2,000
9th/12th Johnny Archer $2,000
9th/12th He Wen Li $2,000
13th/16th Wang Can $1,800
13th/16th Tom D'Alfonso $1,800
13th/16th Corey Deuel $1,800
13th/16th Yukio Akagariyama $1,800
17th/24th Shawn Putnam $1,600
17th/24th Raj Hundal $1,600
17th/24th Nick Van den Berg $1,600
17th/24th Chris Melling $1,600
17th/24th Earl Strickland $1,600
17th/24th Jin Hu Dang $1,600
17th/24th Huidji See $1,600
17th/24th Albin Ouschan $1,600
25th/32nd Jason Klatt $1,400
25th/32nd Ko-Pin Ye $1,400
25th/32nd Louis Ulrich $1,400
25th/32nd Haitao Liu $1,400
25th/32nd Oscar Dominguez $1,400
25th/32nd Brandon Shuff $1,400
25th/32nd Daryl Peach $1,400
25th/32nd David Alcaide $1,400
I think you put too much faith in odd format tournaments held on sometimes questionable equipment. The standard for me is US Opens. Despite all its troubles of late with pay issues the format, equipment and fields have been consistent for many years.
There is the little matter of total money won as well.
Of the players you listed Shane has played three of them in long format 10 ball races. He destroyed all of them. The WPA event thing is a valid criticism and one day he will get that monkey off his back. But to say he is somehow not in the same class as those you mention because he hasn't won a WPA event is pretty silly IMO.