a 9 ft model of a 1945 Brunswick Centennial would just about do it for me. Absolutely gorgeous and a real pleasure to play on.
But, that's not a Brunswick...that's a "Gregory" original, Brunswick never built a table that plays that good
I'd take a Brunswick Kling, restored by Mark Gregory and then set up modern by either Gregory or RKC.
Please.
Hurry.
Kevin
That's the 2nd great Centennial I've seen from Mark, or is that Dean's table too? I know Dean was looking to sell his.
Kevin
My choice as well. Grew up with a 5x10 Kling in our parlor
and was allowed to begin play in the late 1940's.
Dad sold it while I was "vacationing" in Southeast Asia in the 1960's.
I was devastated but soon got over it, as Uncle Sam kept my mind
and body occupied with other things.
Pictured is a 10' snooker table convereted to a 10' drop pocket pool table, Dean bought a 9ft. Mark has more in inventory for sale if anyone's interested
this is as simple a question as they come...
I would prefer the table I have now (My grandfathers Brunswick Regina) completely restored to original condition (as far as wood work, etc...) and then have it Cobracized!!
Properly installed, they all play the same.
Pro-Ams have a ball return system and are made for a 1-piece slate. Pro-Ams are popular for tournaments because they can be moved quickly; the legs come off and the entire bed moves as one piece.
The Professional and Paragon are both drop pocket tables and have a leveling system made for 3 piece slate. The only differences between the the two are styling, price and the type of wood they are available in. Any table that has Dymondwood rails will not have the rounded corners because it's so hard on the tools.
I sat in my dorm room listening to the radio as they pulled the lottery numbers for that tropical vacation. Mine came up 312 so I never got to go. I hear the weather was balmy.
Rob, think about this for moment. If Brunswick had it right as yout put it, and Diamond copied Brunswick's design, then that means I shouldn't be able to take a brand new GC and make it play better than it was built, right? Diamond is not using the same spec's as Brunswick does, and I'll clear that up for you. Brunswick's down angle for mounting the cushions is 23.5 degrees bevel, with a sub-rail thickness of over 1 11/16" thick. Diamond's is 24.5 degrees down angle, with an exact 1 11/16" thick sub-rail. Diamond's pocket angles are 141/102 with a 15 degee down angle. Brunswick's are 142/104 with a 13 degee down angle, but most of the miter angles in the pockets are inconsistant, meaning not the same from corner pocket to corner pocket, as well as in the side pockets, so you don't really know what they are.
So now, where is the "copy" of Brunswick's design that has made the Diamond's play so much better today? The table mechanic that told you Diamond copied Brunswick was wrong
Glen
9 foot pro-am, in cocobola (okay, I'll settle for cherry finish). I'm gonna get one, too! (as soon as the wife agrees...) :thumbup: