You think that your one interaction with one league player is relevant? I don't.
Tournaments are, by necessity, brief interactions between two players. They can tell you plenty in a badly uneven match up and tell you NOTHING about two players who are at close levels.
A longer match will often tell you EVERYTHING about who is the better player. If they finish a long match close, too, then they need to match up more to come up with a reliable conclusion.
"Tournaments are a better measure" is absolute nonsense.
Hey Bob, dig the sand out of your vagina and calm down. I never said one way or another was a better measure of anything. And if you think that was my one and only brief encounter with gambling you obviously don't know me. If you have read some of my other posts this week you would know that I am in favor of longer matches also. Apparently you took something I said the wrong way, or your so invested in your argument that you attack anyone with a different opinion. I honestly can't understand why you got so bent over my reply to the OP.
And yes I do think my experience was relevant to the conversation topic.