I don't think I could ever do it.
No video, sorry.
No video, sorry.
Larry is one of the few players I've ever seen play that I think could shoot this shot corner to corner and draw the cue ball all the way back into the pocket where he started. He has the most powerful stroke I've ever seen and I heard Billy Incardona say the same thing doing commentary in an Accu-stats video. Billy knows more about pool and players than most of us combined. Billy made the statement that he'd back Larry against anyone in a contest for drawing the cue ball.is your friend Larry Nevel by any chance?
The accuracy impresses me more than the distance.
Draw is a bit self-correcting if you hit off-center, so it's possible that the CB is coming back in a bit of a parabola, in which case he may have missed the OB if it wasn't a hanger. Still an impressive shot, but I just wanted to point out that it's about applying that much draw with some accuracy, but you don't have to hit the OB dead on for it to work.
magyer i did it on a 6 by 12 snooker table it is a nice shot .you really have to have a nice stroke to do that. only did it once though,lol.My buddy can put the cue ball hanging in one corner pocket, an object ball hanging in the other corner pocket and make the ball and draw the cue all the way back and scratch in the pocket the cue was near originally. On his 9 footer. I thought it was really impressive considering the distance from cue ball to object ball.
http://youtu.be/stDX6aNPpQY
In a trick shot video I made I do a similar shot around the 1:45 mark. I know his shot is significantly more difficult but I'm just a league player only.
So I'm confident he can do it and I'm 50% sure I could do it with enough incentive to abuse my equipment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
magyer i did it on a 6 by 12 snooker table it is a nice shot .you really have to have a nice stroke to do that. only did it once though,lol.
earthquake out.
Not sure which corners you are talking about without seeing a diagram, but I know that this shot can be hit a fairly high % of the time by someone who is adept at masse shots.
Hitting a draw shot off center does cause swerve, which is basically a mini-masse. I believe that the swerve from hitting a draw shot out of the corner pocket a bit off center may be enough to make the CB curve in on the way back for a wider range than you may think. This is especially true if the pocket you are drawing back to is more generous. Because of that effect, I would challenge the assertion that drawing the CB back into the corner means that the OB would have gone into a tight pocket several feet away. I could be totally wrong, but it would be neat to see that on video.You can apply enough draw to make the CB "correct its path" to about parallel to the one it would have taken if you had hit the OB dead center, but it will never return all the way to that exact path. So if you hit the OB a little off center and the CB deflect 3 inches to the right before the draw takes over and brings it back toward you, you're going to miss the scratch by at least those 3 inches. The only way to scratch off this shot without hitting the OB with extreme accuracy is to have some amount of masse spin on the ball counteracting the CB's movement down the tangent line before drawing back. While this effect may work out just right for shot success once in a blue moon, anyone who's making the shot consistently is hitting the OB dead-center with extreme accuracy (i.e. they would have made it into a very tight pocket several feet away).
-Andrew
Is that really you shooting? Good job.
My buddy can put the cue ball hanging in one corner pocket, an object ball hanging in the other corner pocket and make the ball and draw the cue all the way back and scratch in the pocket the cue was near originally. On his 9 footer. I thought it was really impressive considering the distance from cue ball to object ball.
Yes that's me and thx bro. I invented the last contraption shot. Kinda silly but fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know that Andy Quinn (from STL) used to use the same shot as a proposition shot for action.
he would gamble that he could do it 8 out of 10 times... and he rarely lost... not sure what kind of table, or cloth, or balls though...
regardless, that's pretty sporty!