I do recall saying that a ball struck with a " touch of inside" does have horizontal rotation on it, so I'm not denying any fundamental laws of physics. As Mikjary says, "You can call hitting a ball off center English if you'd like."
If a ball is hit with any type of horizontal rotation on it, if you want to call it english, call it english. What I'm saying is that C.J. Wiley has CHOSEN not to call horizontal rotation "spin or "english" when the rotation is as slow as the rotation on the basketball when it falls off your finger. He refers to horizontal rotation as spin - english only when the spin is so fast that it creates a blur when observed. I don't want to put words in his mouth. I've never heard him state it quite that way. That's just my perception of his reasoning.
If my perception is right, he's only trying to point out the distinction between extremely slow horizontal rotation and and horizontal rotation that looks like a blur because many posters believe that every time horizontal rotation is applied it should look like a blur. It shouldn't look like a blur if only a touch of it is applied.
So go ahead and call it english if you want. I'm just tired of all these posts that pop up whenever T.O.I. is discussed that start out with,"Hey, C.J - When are you going to start calling it English?" No one's right and no one's wrong in this debate. I've never heard him deny that horizontal rotation is applied on a T.O.I shot. He has chosen not to call horizontal rotation "spin" or "english" for the sake of clarity. Shots that apply horizontal rotation at extremely slow speeds are employed in much different ways and produce much different results than shots that apply extremely fast horizontal rotation. So he calls fast horizontal rotation "spin" or "english," and he calls extremely slow horizontal rotation,"side."Those of us who have learned from his writings and DVD's have followed that reasoning; and if truth be known, it took me a while to stop calling it "english."
I have nothing against those who don't see any benefit in T.O.I. as a ball pocketing method. What I don't understand is the posters who disrupt discussions of T.O.I. with this "Is it Enlglish or isn't it English," nonsense and who don't have the patience enough to try to understand the reasoning behind the semantics.
Oh, maybe it's just a little problem with the simple fact that words actually mean things. As far as understanding the reasoning behind those words, we do understand. It's many of the proponents of your own made up language that really don't understand. There is no doubt in my mind that if some APA 4 came up with all the exact same words as CJ has in his posts, you would laugh him off of here. Think about that for a little bit....
