Ron Swanson
Banned
Yes I did.
Where?
Anyway, i reckon there's a new line of jb cases coming out.
Yes I did.
Where?
Anyway, i reckon there's a new line of jb cases coming out.
You can be next in line Anthony. If I win then I will play you the following week the same way, 10 ahead for 20k.
Oh you have quite a few british fans, don't worry about that. We love a bit of farce, us.
What does it matter? Thanks for the space I occupy in your head Tim. I appreciate the continued opportunities to tell people we have cases for sale and that CTE works. Each post you make addressing me allows me to have one more advertisement out there.
Really, is that what you were taught, that rail birds should be chirping between 2 parties trying to negotiate a bet with one another. Really?
Man, those "46 years" of experience is paying off in spades
You have nothing to offer, you are not backing anyone and most likely won't bet one thin dime, in other words, in regards to Lou and JB "offers" to gamble, you should just STFU and let the men handle things.
It matters because it would demonstrate you are impartial. Do you have faith in the partisan, John?
And spam is part of modern life. You filter it out.
And what if lou doesn't play? Is 8 pack going to get a call?
I wish people I had already beaten would dare me to play again, they usually want 2 or 3 balls if I won by the margin Lou did last time.
Go troll somewhere else.
This is a 'public' forum & the whole point of putting it here is what?
They could do in PM or where ever if John did not want it for the public eyes , ears, & words.
You're a Genius.
It matters because it would demonstrate you are impartial. Do you have faith in the partisan, John?
And spam is part of modern life. You filter it out.
It means that 3 fouls in a row doesn't lose the game. 10 ahead means that the first player to get 10 games in front wins the match.pardon my ignorance, but what does " gambling rules no 3 foul - 10 ahead." mean?
From the first post
3. "The game is one pocket - gambling rules no 3 foul - 10 ahead."
1) Who cares how long the match takes for $20k? If you take the purse and divide it by the total number of games they play, it'll STILL be WAY more per game than a HUGE majority of the posters here have ever played for - guaranteed.
2) Lou's response was bizarre. Bizarre to the max. He's clearly the better player by a solar system. Lou's recent post of his 100-something ball 14.1 was very smooth and talented. You can give John 50 years and he wouldn't run balls like that. Forget PJ's MR reply/analysis -- that's the "stupid analyzing the bizarre." If John asked Lou to play at the top of K2, Lou SHOULD be insta-calling and making phone calls to hire the sherpas. Who the hell cares WHERE the last match was played, are you frickin' KIDDING me?!?!?!?!!?!??? If I ran out like Lou and John chirped a $20k bet and listed VERY reasonable "non-negotiables," I'd basically be telling my wife to not expect me around the house too much between now and the match and to book my flight asap. If John wants the match to take place in Mozambique, Lou should make sure his passport is up to date and learn the pops and clicks it takes to ask for a water and where the bathroom is at. Unreal.
3) Lou is clearly a heavy favorite -- what is the line if this goes off? People think John has ZERO chance to win and that can't be true. If someone gives me a REAL line that reflects the REAL difference in ability, I'd like to bet on John.
Lou's post was chicken-shittified to the abso-effing-lute max. Just sayin'.
You seem a little biased toward your friend to me. The other view point is one guy is willing to negotiate terms and come to a compromise they can both agree on (the one that made the most concessions the last time), and one guy isn't willing to negotiate anything, not one single thing, and it will be all his terms that he dictates or nothing at all (the one who made the least concessions last time and dictated most of the terms then too). Now which one of the two approaches is the one used by someone who actually wants to see a match come off in real life? Which of those approaches would be used by someone who is more interested in having something to bark about online but isn't so interested in having a match actually come of it in real life? Seems pretty clear to me.
Also pretty clear to me is that Lou doesn't think he is stealing or that Lou is "better by a solar system". He thinks he has the edge, but also knows he can lose if John plays closer to his peak than he does and it could easily happen. This isn't at all stealing in Lou's mind with very little chance he could lose. John also has repeatedly said he thinks he (John) is the better player and will win and is confident in that. They claim similar straight pool high runs etc. Nobody thinks they are stealing in this match up, or at least Lou doesn't and I don't think John does but who knows for sure what is in his mind. He isn't always the most rational IMO (which I think he would admit and is not a dig).
Barton's had a 98 at straight pool.
True story.
Not on video. That was done before video cameras were invented.
Good memory though, I am impressed by the number of things I have said that you have retained. Glad to know I have at least one British fan.![]()
Additionally, the 98 was before Barton knew CTE. True story.
I made the most concessions last time.You seem a little biased toward your friend to me. The other view point is one guy is willing to negotiate terms and come to a compromise they can both agree on (the one that made the most concessions the last time), and one guy isn't willing to negotiate anything, not one single thing, and it will be all his terms that he dictates or nothing at all (the one who made the least concessions last time and dictated most of the terms then too). Now which one of the two approaches is the one used by someone who actually wants to see a match come off in real life? Which of those approaches would be used by someone who is more interested in having something to bark about online but isn't so interested in having a match actually come of it in real life? Seems pretty clear to me.
Also pretty clear to me is that Lou doesn't think he is stealing or that Lou is "better by a solar system". He thinks he has the edge, but also knows he can lose if John plays closer to his peak than he does and it could easily happen. This isn't at all stealing in Lou's mind with very little chance he could lose. John also has repeatedly said he thinks he (John) is the better player and will win and is confident in that. They claim similar straight pool high runs etc. Nobody thinks they are stealing in this match up, or at least Lou doesn't and I don't think John does but who knows for sure what is in his mind. He isn't always the most rational IMO (which I think he would admit and is not a dig).
That is also correct. And I was playing every possible waking moment at that time in my life.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk