After reading this thread I'm glad I don't over analyze things like some people do. I pick it up . If it feels good and I can make balls consistently do what I want them to do I like it. lol If I don't I don't
Also..Does not ding, dent, warp. That's everything
I'm actually lost as to what ya mean Rick....what did i say thats so far out of line with what Scott says? Its not like I dont know the guy at all lol....
matter of fact.....my real special cue....phuk i dont feel like talking about it but just since i guess something I said your deeming not "true" i guess
well my custom player, the cue was made from a 1890's brunswck, was over sized and straiight and had its matching shaft.......extremely solid, low deflection cue/shaft........its been my every day player for amlost a decade...
i have other cues....plenty of cues. Soutwest, a sweet unknown.....some really nice old hueblers, and like 3 or so that i made in my case ready to play....
some shit bag broke the shaft.....and i hope he dies a firey death one day....but i digress
that happened thursday night. I had a doubles event my firend had asked me to play in earlier during week....I told him i wasn't really feeling up to it, but i'd give it a good college try because i told him i would be his partner.....
hummm....wtf do i play with? Every last one of thecues I have are great cues.....but they all feel alien in my hands, compared.
My everyday cue was 12mm with a short new micarta ferrule.....I picked my little butterfly with the ivoryy joint and ferrule (long ferrule too) which is close to the same weight as my dead everyday player.....but with 13mm.....
it still has lots of spine, butits much higher deflection......needless to say, jarred and the strange wood didn't affect me one bit.....not one...played excellent.
but ididn't shoot any shots 9 foot with 4396 tips of ENGLISH either.....
the two cues are very very diff.....was I comfortable? HELL NO.....but none of it was of any consequence, as I'm pretty sure there wasn't one shot that I would have hit any better with my old cue, because i hit dam near all of them good. Long, tight, bank.......and just used that english to help on angles not drive the car.
I take it the recipe was a hit? Etouffee i mean
-greyghost
Keebie,
I was not suggesting that you were saying anything that was not "true".
It just seems the Scott Lee 'gospel' is cue speed & tip location & NOTHING else matters or makes a difference.
Now, the subject is equipment & he is getting this NEW & rather different shaft.
It just seemed odd to me not s fit.
Best Wishes for You & Yours,
Rick
Keebie,
I was not suggesting that you were saying anything that was not "true".
It just seems the Scott Lee 'gospel' is cue speed & tip location & NOTHING else matters or makes a difference.
Now, the subject is equipment & he is getting this NEW & rather different shaft.
It just seemed odd to me not s fit.
Best Wishes for You & Yours,
Rick
While I would like to try one, it's probably not worth paying too much attention to the hype at this stage. The cue ball action just looked like any other shaft to me, squirt and swerve.
If I start seeing pros using them in tournaments, especially if they're winning, then I might be all over this shaft.
Jasmine Ouchan just won the Euro tour championship with one.
Brandon says that because predator has been working on this particular shaft for about 20 years now
earl won how many tournaments and wc's and us opens with a cuetek??? dont see everyone using those still......even back then.....bet money its not as goodas wood........humans thinking they gonna make a better product than wood lol....thats hilarious.
when theres a quantum computer controlling the carbon nano bots in the shaft....then we can talk about it being as good or better than wood.......
carbon has a lack of connection under wood.....so cant touch it....wont make as good of a musical instrument either.....oops cues are percussion instruments...
bummer for the humans,
-Greyghost
I bought a graphite fishing rod because it was said to have more tactile feedback because of the high density of the fibers compared to epoxy glass.
I imagine that same may be true for a cue shaft for those that like a crisp tactile feel.
Then I accidently stepped on it and it cracked in half because it was brittle. I use Ugly Stick rods now.:smile:
Ever see a shooter blame his bad play on his solid wood shaft and break it in half over his knee? I did and they were 2 Tad shafts. That might be harder to do with graphite.
I think with any material there are two major factors, what the creators of x-item say that the material does and what the users of x-item think about how it feels to use it.
Sometimes these line up and sometimes they don't.
I know that my best intentions in case making don't always go over so well in the real world. As a result I have to sometimes go back and adjust the design to fit how people use cases rather than to try to change how cases are used.
I am a big fan of innovation and performance improvements. What I am not a big fan of is technobabble hype that sounds mostly made-up. At some point there should be some independent data to back up the hype. The pool industry in so many ways is like a license to steal. There is no barrier to entry, no consumer reports, no standards certifying body really....no consumer protection in any way....so people can just get away with making shit up and very few people can actually contest it.
Not to say Predator is doing this. They are after all an industry leader who sponsors many events and players. They have essentially created the whole performance shaft/performance cue sector in pool. Without them there is likely no OB, no Tiger, no Jacoby Edge, and none of the other companies making "performance" shafts.
But I sincerely wish two things, one that Royce Bunnell were still with us to offer his take on this shaft and two that somehow an independent lab would take all of these shafts from every company and do some real true testing to determine some performance metrics that make sense and can be replicated in other labs. Then we could start to have a real true conversation on what actual advantage any shaft actually gives to the user without the marketing-speak.
But I sincerely wish two things, one that Royce Bunnell were still with us to offer his take on this shaft and two that somehow an independent lab would take all of these shafts from every company and do some real true testing to determine some performance metrics that make sense and can be replicated in other labs. Then we could start to have a real true conversation on what actual advantage any shaft actually gives to the user without the marketing-speak.
I can put a simple design on paper for a testing robot in 5 minutes, but for some reason there is a huge disconnect in what people feel a robot 'should' do. IMO moving the cue in a straight line, at a precise speed is all that is needed to do comparison testing. But then again, I like to keep stuff simple.:thumbup:
Lets start a gofundme page to raise money for Dr. Dave to build an iron willie/myth destroyer cue testing robot!
Also, really lets give Bob Jewett credit for the ferruless shaft. He was the first to recognize the weight reducing advantage of eliminating the ferrule afaik.
This thread got so stupid.