But more than accuracy is needed for cueball control (we can't control the cueball directly, of course, but obviously we can do so indirectly in how we execute the shot, otherwise there would be no such thing as playing position).
When I attempt to pocket a ball and also play position on the same shot, I not only have to be accurate in where my cueball contacts the object ball (and in where my tip contacts the cueball), but I also have to execute the shot in terms of the many other factors involved in controlling the cueball in order to get position for the next shot.
So, my question is, does the quiet eye technique help with those other factors as well, and if so, how?
Simply put it gives the brain more visual data.
If I flipped 2 pages if images at you in
.250sec or quicker you will find them harder to describe. Give yourself .500sec and you can give more info. If you went say a whole 2...you can give a buttload of info.
Those stupid picture recognition games at the bars are based off similar principles.
That's where the idea of consistency comes in. If even say Scott and I are talking and I say the shot speed is a 5.
Let's say that's what everyone means by medium.
Well of course the speeds of the table change. Of course Scott and I understand each other.
But at the end of the day the real "system" is the visualization and the actual visual images those are based off of.
If feel is such a big proponent of the game no matter what, then wouldn't you say the eyes could possibly play The SINGLE most important role before anything else?
Yea sure some of us practice eyes closed....but we don't stumble into the pool hall with a blindfold on lol.
At the end of the day just don't be "twitchy" at a minimum. Slow your roll and pay attention.
-greyghost
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk