What is the Supposed Phenomena of Center to Edge Aiming?

ENGLISH!

ENGLISH!

Banned
Silver Member
What is the Supposed Phenomenon of Center to Edge Aiming?

This thread is an attempt to garner for ALL concerned...

EXACTLY WHAT is the Supposed Phenomenon for Center to Edge 'Aiming'.

If anyone knows what it is supposed to be, then I would appreciate it if they could explain exactly WHAT it is supposed to be in reasonable rational terms...

& not to just say... I or we do not know WHAT it is supposed to be, but it does exist.

This is not a 'poll' to see how many BELIEVE in it's existence if they do not even know WHAT it it supposed to be.

Once it is determined & defined as to WHAT it is... Then perhaps it can be discussed as to it's potential validity.

Also... No one is forced to participate here & no on is forced to read any further in this thread. Each individual will make their own decision regarding that CHOICE.

I ask that EVERYONE that does Choose to post here to PLEASE do so in a civil manner & without all of the personal crap.

Please discuss the topic or please do not participate here in this thread at all.

Thank you for your cooperation should you Choose to extend it.

Best Wishes for ALL & Your Family & Friends As Well.

Rick

phe·nom·e·non
fəˈnäməˌnän,fəˈnäməˌnən/Submit
noun
1.
a fact or situation that is observed to exist or happen, especially one whose cause or explanation is in question.
"glaciers are unique and interesting natural phenomena"
synonyms: occurrence, event, happening, fact, situation, circumstance, experience, case, incident, episode
"a rare phenomenon"
 
Last edited:
cookie man said:
Why? You will as always, disagree with whatever an experienced user says.
Click to expand...

YOU, just don't get it & YOU show every non biased member & visitor that YOU just don't get it.

A Famous person once said, “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”
 
ENGLISH! said:
YOU, just don't get it & YOU show every non biased member & visitor that YOU just don't get it.

A Famous person once said, “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”
Click to expand...

You haven't gotten one single thing about CTE
 
cookie man said:
You haven't gotten one single thing about CTE
Click to expand...

A Famous person once said, “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”

If you want to go down... do it by yourself.

All that you are doing is trying to keep this thread from getting off the ground & perhaps getting legs.

Some are just afraid to look under the hood as another would say.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
 
ENGLISH! said:
A Famous person once said, “Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”

If you want to go down... do it by yourself.

All that you are doing is trying to keep this thread from getting off the ground & perhaps getting legs.

Some are just afraid to look under the hood as another would say.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
Click to expand...

Thanks for admitting that you are afraid to look under the hood. You would have a greater understanding if you did instead of making all your assumptions from behind the keyboard.
 
cookie man said:
Thanks for admitting that you are afraid to look under the hood. You would have a greater understanding if you did instead of making all your assumptions from behind the keyboard.
Click to expand...

Same thing, same thing, same thing... over & over & over...from you.

Find new reproaches for me...

if you want to continue to discuss people.

“Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”

As I said, you do not even understand what the issue is.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
 
ENGLISH! said:
Same thing, same thing, same thing... over & over & over...from you.

Find new reproaches for me...

if you want to continue to discuss people.

“Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”

As I said, you do not even understand what the issue is.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
Click to expand...

Ahh, I think everyone is getting a real clear vision of who ( i meant what,lol ) the REAL ISSUE is.
 
Mr. Wilson said:
If you reply to more of his threads and are not on topic or it is some attack, there will be consequences.
Click to expand...

Apparently, you don't even realize that this entire thread is nothing more than an attack on Stan. Stan mentioned the topic of this thread in another thread, and clearly stated that it would be revealed in his book when it is finished.

Rick started needling Stan there about it, and mocking Stan for it. Then Rick started this thread in a further attempt at mocking and needling Stan. The attack is from Rick. Anything else is just defensive hits.
 
He's been told he can start his own thread.

He's following instructions and for all I can see, is following the rules.
 
I don't have the answer.
I am more interested in how many have tried it and quit.
I think one defender of the method has also quit using it .


When this method came out years ago, it was touted to be really simple.
People swore by it .
Then close to two decades later, it's actually gotten more complicated .
One or two or more have posted videos on youtube how "simple" the method is.
And it turns out they were not qualified to teach it and actually did the method all wrong .

And 10 years from now, I don't think this whole thing is going to get any simpler.
People are still going to go back and forth about the thing.
 
JoeyInCali said:
I don't have the answer.
I am more interested in how many have tried it and quit.
I think one defender of the method has also quit using it .


When this method came out years ago, it was touted to be really simple.
People swore by it .
Then close to two decades later, it's actually gotten more complicated .
One or two or more have posted videos on youtube how "simple" the method is.
And it turns out they were not qualified to teach it and actually did the method all wrong .

And 10 years from now, I don't think this whole thing is going to get any simpler.
People are still going to go back and forth about the thing.
Click to expand...

<<<:thumbup2:>>>
 
JoeyInCali said:
I don't have the answer.
I am more interested in how many have tried it and quit.
I think one defender of the method has also quit using it .


When this method came out years ago, it was touted to be really simple.
People swore by it .
Then close to two decades later, it's actually gotten more complicated .
One or two or more have posted videos on youtube how "simple" the method is.
And it turns out they were not qualified to teach it and actually did the method all wrong .

And 10 years from now, I don't think this whole thing is going to get any simpler.
People are still going to go back and forth about the thing.
Click to expand...

I don't think it has gotten more complicated, In fact i believe it's the simplest, easiest, most reliable objective way to aim. I got it from the very first phone call to Hal. Took all of five minutes.
 
cookie man said:
I don't think it has gotten more complicated, In fact i believe it's the simplest, easiest, most reliable objective way to aim. I got it from the very first phone call to Hal. Took all of five minutes.
Click to expand...
OK, why does it take so much material to explain?

Ok, then it can be written in one page of paper.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top