To hell with working you way to it. You ain't gonna lean the true apex of a turn by driving it at a crawl.
Now get out there and put the pedal down.
Sunova...I should have thought of that and saved myself a short story.
To hell with working you way to it. You ain't gonna lean the true apex of a turn by driving it at a crawl.
Now get out there and put the pedal down.
I have watched a a series of videos lately that promotes using center ball (without right or left) for positioning at first then adding right and left afterwards to be used only rarely in 8 and 9 ball. It indicates most players tend to use spin on most every shot and that is why they plateau. It is their lack of understanding of natural ball positioning that eventually stops them from improving. At least that is how I interpreted it. I would like to know what the others on here for the most part think of that and if they play spin on most of their shots or not.
If you don't spin the ball you will not get consistent shape. Anybody try hitting center ball playing 3 cushion. Ridiculous. Spin is called for more often than not.
I thought the OP was talking about learning on a pocket table.
It's also important for a "beginner'' to understand when cutting a ball when the cue ball comes off the object ball, with a center ball hit, the cue ball then has ''induced'' spin created from the collision and changing direction. That is good information. But too much information for a beginner creates analysis paralysis. It's not like throwing a bowling ball. There's allot going on....too keep it simple is the best course of action when you first learn. Have a merry xmas.
He was. I was merely suggesting that center ball does not work 100% of the time. As a matter of fact, I think the more exact you are in getting shape the more necessary spin is. If you are playing to just an area it might work but when playing to an exact spot it will almost never work. My two cents.
I read it. Nothing is new. Please don't suggest I didn't read "it." Of all the posters on this ridiculous topics, I've read more than most. You need to go reread all of his posts.. I don't need to.
Freddie <~~~ must be a rookie
He was. I was merely suggesting that center ball does not work 100% of the time.
Reading and comprehending are 2 totally different things. Clearly you performed the 1st but completely missed the 2nd.
I don't care how good of a player you are, be it just an OK amateur or a major pro, you have to make serious adjustments to your game when you go from one table to another because of all the variables that side spin introduces and the different effects that the table and balls bring to that. So again, I will say this has nothing to do with you elite players that clearly are professionals hidden on a billiards forum that have logged the hours to master all variables. It has to do with telling players that are not anywhere near your level they should play with spin before they haven't even mastered the most fundamental control of the cue ball.
You and Mr. Armstrong, being the highly skilled professionals I'm sure you are, should be intelligent enough to know (if you are any good at this game) that there are people in everything that have more knowledge than skill. So I am not a Super 7 in APA, that does not mean I don't have knowledge of the game that far exceeds yours. Maybe I just lack the execution and commitment to it right now. Besides for either of you to say that you can't learn a thing from someone lower than you is really quite arrogant and I am 100% sure not a true statement at all.
Reading and comprehending are 2 totally different things. Clearly you performed the 1st but completely missed the 2nd.
I don't care how good of a player you are, be it just an OK amateur or a major pro, you have to make serious adjustments to your game when you go from one table to another because of all the variables that side spin introduces and the different effects that the table and balls bring to that. So again, I will say this has nothing to do with you elite players that clearly are professionals hidden on a billiards forum that have logged the hours to master all variables. It has to do with telling players that are not anywhere near your level they should play with spin before they haven't even mastered the most fundamental control of the cue ball.
You and Mr. Armstrong, being the highly skilled professionals I'm sure you are, should be intelligent enough to know (if you are any good at this game) that there are people in everything that have more knowledge than skill. So I am not a Super 7 in APA, that does not mean I don't have knowledge of the game that far exceeds yours. Maybe I just lack the execution and commitment to it right now. Besides for either of you to say that you can't learn a thing from someone lower than you is really quite arrogant and I am 100% sure not a true statement at all.
Reading and comprehending are 2 totally different things. Clearly you performed the 1st but completely missed the 2nd.
I don't care how good of a player you are, be it just an OK amateur or a major pro, you have to make serious adjustments to your game when you go from one table to another because of all the variables that side spin introduces and the different effects that the table and balls bring to that. So again, I will say this has nothing to do with you elite players that clearly are professionals hidden on a billiards forum that have logged the hours to master all variables. It has to do with telling players that are not anywhere near your level they should play with spin before they haven't even mastered the most fundamental control of the cue ball.
You and Mr. Armstrong, being the highly skilled professionals I'm sure you are, should be intelligent enough to know (if you are any good at this game) that there are people in everything that have more knowledge than skill. So I am not a Super 7 in APA, that does not mean I don't have knowledge of the game that far exceeds yours. Maybe I just lack the execution and commitment to it right now. Besides for either of you to say that you can't learn a thing from someone lower than you is really quite arrogant and I am 100% sure not a true statement at all.
Skippy with all due respect please figure out who you are trying to school. There are a handful of members here that truly do know way more then most here....or anywhere for that matter. Freddie is one for sure.
I respectfully disagree. What can you learn from a player that is "lower" than you? You have already been there. This is why you try to play with players that are better than you. So you can learn new things. All you can get from a player "lower" than you (and I'm not crazy about that word) is friendly competition.
I've learned plenty from lower rated players.
Okay. I think I'll still continue to play higher rated players to further my education in seeing the table.
Reading and comprehending are 2 totally different things. Clearly you performed the 1st but completely missed the 2nd.
Skippy said:All of us have been at a stage in our game that we just needed to concentrate on making a ball and gave little to no thought to our next one. As we progressed, we started thinking about trying to get to another one. Not any specific ball, just one of ours. Then we started thinking 1, 2, 3 balls out, then eventually a run out. During that progression is when we start trying to control the cue ball more and more but too many people start too early trying to use spin to do it instead of natural roll. I truly believes it holds them back and lengthens the amount of time for them to actually progress in the phase because of all the additional variables that one little act introduces.
And of course, I never said such a thing.Skippy said:It has to do with telling players that are not anywhere near your level they should play with spin before they haven't even mastered the most fundamental control of the cue ball.