Diamond versus Brunswick

.. But the GC frame and table set up was not designed by a jeweler.
And the rest of the GC I design was not done by a pool player. It was done by some idiot modern furniture designer.

The GC V is better because they have copied some of the Diamond design, such as the flush pocket liners.

The GC III was a total disaster quality-wise around the time it came out. Broken pockets, warping and un-pinned slates, the standard gooey pocket liners, drop pockets that spit the balls back onto the table. All of that prompted one room owner to go to the BCA Trade Show to seek some help which ended in a screaming match between him and the Brunswick droids. No guarantee on commercially-used tables.

Whether the GC V has solved all of the problems of that period of the GC IIIs, I have no idea, but I would not trust Brunswick to do the right thing.
 
The flush pockets started with the GC IV.

In regards to solving all the problems...it depends on what you consider a problem. I think the GCV was the best table yet. However they still have manufacturing problems. I could tell you stories of my GC V purchase if you wanted to hear them. Regardless I am still very happy with my purchase and wouldn’t go back and purchase anything else.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
And the rest of the GC I design was not done by a pool player. It was done by some idiot modern furniture designer.

The GC V is better because they have copied some of the Diamond design, such as the flush pocket liners.

The GC III was a total disaster quality-wise around the time it came out. Broken pockets, warping and un-pinned slates, the standard gooey pocket liners, drop pockets that spit the balls back onto the table. All of that prompted one room owner to go to the BCA Trade Show to seek some help which ended in a screaming match between him and the Brunswick droids. No guarantee on commercially-used tables.

Whether the GC V has solved all of the problems of that period of the GC IIIs, I have no idea, but I would not trust Brunswick to do the right thing.

Thank you for posting :)
 
... What do you consider to be the better pool table .../QUOTE]

You mentioned the Diamond Pro-Am but not the Diamond Professional. To many people, the Diamond Pro is the better looking Diamond table (more along the lines of recent Gold Crowns aesthetically).
 
And the rest of the GC I design was not done by a pool player. It was done by some idiot modern furniture designer.

The GC V is better because they have copied some of the Diamond design, such as the flush pocket liners.

The GC III was a total disaster quality-wise around the time it came out. Broken pockets, warping and un-pinned slates, the standard gooey pocket liners, drop pockets that spit the balls back onto the table. All of that prompted one room owner to go to the BCA Trade Show to seek some help which ended in a screaming match between him and the Brunswick droids. No guarantee on commercially-used tables.

Whether the GC V has solved all of the problems of that period of the GC IIIs, I have no idea, but I would not trust Brunswick to do the right thing.

Only the most knowledgeable will know and agree with ^^^^^^^^^^^^^...
 
Both are great!

Grew up on a GC, so I will always love the sound of pocketing balls on it. All Blue label Diamonds seem to play consistent.
Jason
 
In a perfect world I would keep my 9' GCI and replace my 7' Valley with a 7' Diamond. As soon as I have the room to do so that is exactly my intention. that slight bit bigger that a Diamond bar box is makes that virtually impossible for me at the moment.
 
Seems

It seems like this is turning into a quarterly thread. That being said I prefer Diamond,
Hand crafted here in America not assembly line produced in China.
Diamonds have actually influenced Brunswick to try and improve their tables.
 
I've owned both and I prefer the Diamond over the GCIII. Both are good tables assuming they are set up correctly. The biggest difference to me was when I owned the GCIII and I went somewhere that had Diamonds I really struggled. Now I own a Diamond Pro Am and playing on a GC is easy.
 
Pretty close call between the Diamond Pro Am Blue Label and the Gold Crown V. Both are very good pool tables and have their pluses and minuses. I currently have the Diamond but previously had a GCV. Main reason being that the Diamond is the more popular tournament table in use today. All things being equal I would have been just as happy to keep my GC. I liked the GCV the best of the GC series, beautiful table and it played great (when set-up properly).
 
I am of the understanding that Brunswick did fix the problems they had
They hired Mark gregory to make the corrections necessary

Now the table does play better and can be bought with 4.5 or 5 inch pockets

I believe Mark told me that the Gold Crown is a far superior table to the Diamond

Don't ask me to explain it,i always preferred Gpld Crown ,in fact the diamonds play so funny to me that when the only action spot in dallas had diamonds,I did quit playing

the room did shut down and gold Crowns are the tables of choice in Dallas

I am personally installing a Gold Crown 5 in my house on Jan .8

I think the only advantage i can think of for having a diamond table is that it might be better to practice on the tables that you have to play on in the tournaments or your local pool room

From discussions with Mark, I got the idea that he did not think diamonds were good tables construction wise
 
... What do you consider to be the better pool table .../QUOTE]

You mentioned the Diamond Pro-Am but not the Diamond Professional. To many people, the Diamond Pro is the better looking Diamond table (more along the lines of recent Gold Crowns aesthetically).

Here is my Pro.

Cuebuddy..... still snickering at "the standard gooey pocket liners"
 

Attachments

  • rsz_11014.jpg
    rsz_11014.jpg
    61.3 KB · Views: 603
  • 1022.jpg
    1022.jpg
    74.6 KB · Views: 621
The flush pockets started with the GC IV.

In regards to solving all the problems...it depends on what you consider a problem. I think the GCV was the best table yet. However they still have manufacturing problems. I could tell you stories of my GC V purchase if you wanted to hear them. Regardless I am still very happy with my purchase and wouldn’t go back and purchase anything else.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

Maybe intended to be flush -- but the steel components still do not tend to sit flush, in the new GC's I have seen around me. Poor machining details between the rails and steel parts -- who knows -- possibly not even made in the same country, let alone the same plant!

Diamonds always flush and soft on your cue.

Also, regarding Diamonds "banking short" -- they are designed to be able to manipulate your banks -- so you can hit with speed and bank really short, or you can slow roll and add a touch of english and bank wide. YOU control whether they bank short or not. That is a feature, as I understand it, that Greg Sullivan specifically wanted because he likes Banks, and wanted to give the tools to the bankers to hit them however they need to! But if you hit too hard -- yup, you will come up short :D:D
 
Here is my Pro.

Cuebuddy..... still snickering at "the standard gooey pocket liners"

Makes me wonder if Diamond ever solved the problem of the black marks their pockets were leaving on the object balls. It took me a very long time to finally get rid of that black stain on all the pockets that was transferring to the balls. I would have greatly preferred pockets that were natural tan leather.
 
Here are the facts of the matter concerning the Brunswick Gold Crown 5:

The only thing I will say about the manual is that I do not agree with the cloth installation method and it should show the Simonis Installation pattern of installation.

Trent from Toledo

Here are the facts of the matter concerning the Brunswick Gold Crown 5:

49261821_946569572219738_1095874889987915776_n.jpg


49938975_946569595553069_4346009224216576000_n.jpg


49321428_946569632219732_2792617620241645568_n.jpg


49315650_946569665553062_7953802922750377984_n.jpg


49089506_946569702219725_1466142654776475648_n.jpg


49899772_946569735553055_7008339393786150912_n.jpg


49203453_946569762219719_3632769122338603008_n.jpg


49759037_946569798886382_6279667504478420992_n.jpg


49203239_946569932219702_8351633511311998976_n.jpg


49368469_946569965553032_4567961146820132864_n.jpg


]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top