And the rest of the GC I design was not done by a pool player. It was done by some idiot modern furniture designer... But the GC frame and table set up was not designed by a jeweler.
And the rest of the GC I design was not done by a pool player. It was done by some idiot modern furniture designer.
The GC V is better because they have copied some of the Diamond design, such as the flush pocket liners.
The GC III was a total disaster quality-wise around the time it came out. Broken pockets, warping and un-pinned slates, the standard gooey pocket liners, drop pockets that spit the balls back onto the table. All of that prompted one room owner to go to the BCA Trade Show to seek some help which ended in a screaming match between him and the Brunswick droids. No guarantee on commercially-used tables.
Whether the GC V has solved all of the problems of that period of the GC IIIs, I have no idea, but I would not trust Brunswick to do the right thing.
... What do you consider to be the better pool table .../QUOTE]
You mentioned the Diamond Pro-Am but not the Diamond Professional. To many people, the Diamond Pro is the better looking Diamond table (more along the lines of recent Gold Crowns aesthetically).
And the rest of the GC I design was not done by a pool player. It was done by some idiot modern furniture designer.
The GC V is better because they have copied some of the Diamond design, such as the flush pocket liners.
The GC III was a total disaster quality-wise around the time it came out. Broken pockets, warping and un-pinned slates, the standard gooey pocket liners, drop pockets that spit the balls back onto the table. All of that prompted one room owner to go to the BCA Trade Show to seek some help which ended in a screaming match between him and the Brunswick droids. No guarantee on commercially-used tables.
Whether the GC V has solved all of the problems of that period of the GC IIIs, I have no idea, but I would not trust Brunswick to do the right thing.
... What do you consider to be the better pool table .../QUOTE]
You mentioned the Diamond Pro-Am but not the Diamond Professional. To many people, the Diamond Pro is the better looking Diamond table (more along the lines of recent Gold Crowns aesthetically).
I agree, I prefer the diamond pro over the diamond pro am and gold grown both.
Hi, what year was the GC V released?
... What do you consider to be the better pool table .../QUOTE]
You mentioned the Diamond Pro-Am but not the Diamond Professional. To many people, the Diamond Pro is the better looking Diamond table (more along the lines of recent Gold Crowns aesthetically).
Here is my Pro.
Cuebuddy..... still snickering at "the standard gooey pocket liners"
The flush pockets started with the GC IV.
In regards to solving all the problems...it depends on what you consider a problem. I think the GCV was the best table yet. However they still have manufacturing problems. I could tell you stories of my GC V purchase if you wanted to hear them. Regardless I am still very happy with my purchase and wouldn’t go back and purchase anything else.
Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
Here is my Pro.
Cuebuddy..... still snickering at "the standard gooey pocket liners"
Makes me wonder if Diamond ever solved the problem of the black marks their pockets were leaving on the object balls. It took me a very long time to finally get rid of that black stain on all the pockets that was transferring to the balls. I would have greatly preferred pockets that were natural tan leather.