Shaw/ Bergman- OFF

Meh. Shaw is an incomplete player. I mean..

Screen Shot 2019-02-07 at 1.40.52 PM copy.png

Opinions...everybodys got one.
 
that sounds pretty unbearable. the most boring game on the most ridiculous sized table. is bergman better than corey on that table size?

First time I saw Shane play.....when he was still the KID in South Dakota Kid....
...he was playing 8-ball on a Valley with Cliff Joiner....race to 25...
...when I walked, Shane was at 12.....I never saw Cliff shoot...:eek:

That was kinda exciting....well, maybe not for Cliff
 
First time I saw Shane play.....when he was still the KID in South Dakota Kid....
...he was playing 8-ball on a Valley with Cliff Joiner....race to 25...
...when I walked, Shane was at 12.....I never saw Cliff shoot...:eek:

That was kinda exciting....well, maybe not for Cliff

Was this at QMaster in VA?


Eric >saw that too?
 
First time I saw Shane play.....when he was still the KID in South Dakota Kid....
...he was playing 8-ball on a Valley with Cliff Joiner....race to 25...
...when I walked, Shane was at 12.....I never saw Cliff shoot...:eek:

That was kinda exciting....well, maybe not for Cliff


Not on a Diamond playing take what you make.
 
Not on a Diamond playing take what you make.

I’m thinking it’s close....running racks on Valleys and Diamonds.
Pockets tend to be bigger on a Valley.......but....
......rails are mostly inconsistent
.....cloth tends to be crappy
.....lotta the cue balls belong in a horror movie
(If I had to play on a Valley for serious $...I’d want the over size ball...it’s consistent)

True, the Diamonds tend to have tighter pockets.....but....
.....the rails tend to be consistent
.....cloth tends to be tournament grade
.....the red dot smart cue ball tends to be the best cue ball in the room

So I feel the Diamond favors the better player


Personally, I won’t play “take what you make”......
.....I consider that rule a devolution...
...if you want more luck in the game, try flipping a coin to see who shoots every shot...:rolleyes:
 
Ummm ok

1st place: 2018 DCC 14.1 challenge
2nd place: 2018 8ball classic
3rd place: 2018 DCC banks
12th place: 2018 DCC 1pocket
1st place: 2017 accustats 14.1 make it happen
1st place: 2017 accustats 8 ball make it happen
2nd place: 2018 carom room 1 pocket
3rd place: 2017 china world championships (Chinese 8ball)
3rd place: 2017 DCC 14.1 challenge
5th place: 2017 west coast challenge 1pocket
1st place: 2016 accustats 8ball make it happen
1st place: 2016 Deurne City banks
2nd place: 2016 DCC banks
4th place: 2016 DCC 1 pocket
5th place: 2016 American 14.1 championship
5th place: 2016 Deurne City 1 pocket
2nd place: 2015 DCC 14.1 challenge
9th place: 2015 World 14.1

For all those "relatively" high placings in One Pocket and Banks, I'd be willing to bet there are at least 5 American players who would literally swim a river of feces to play him in either of those games in a gambling match. Add another 20 or so international players? And those Duerne City Classic matches are all from a European event that zero of the top players in One Pocket or Banks actually plays in, right?

I will give you the Chinese 8 ball event. That's a real accomplishment, to go and play with those monsters and come out anywhere close to the top. But again, it's a game that rewards marksmanship above all other things. Jason's position play is not anywhere close to that of a lot of the top Filipinos, and on tight equipment, that comes to the forefront. He IS literally dead money against any top international player with a break anywhere near as good as his, in any decent length gambling match.

I'll say it right here and now.. Jason Shaw is the benificiary of the modern propensity to play all major events on looser pockets, with brand new cloth. His run and gun style plays well on this sort of equipment, but as evidenced by his performance against Aranas, the second he stops getting a straight in shot on the 1 or 2, he gets drilled. As opposed to Efren in his prime.. Efren was most dangerous when there was a little play in most racks.
 
For all those "relatively" high placings in One Pocket and Banks, I'd be willing to bet there are at least 5 American players who would literally swim a river of feces to play him in either of those games in a gambling match. Add another 20 or so international players? And those Duerne City Classic matches are all from a European event that zero of the top players in One Pocket or Banks actually plays in, right?

I will give you the Chinese 8 ball event. That's a real accomplishment, to go and play with those monsters and come out anywhere close to the top. But again, it's a game that rewards marksmanship above all other things. Jason's position play is not anywhere close to that of a lot of the top Filipinos, and on tight equipment, that comes to the forefront. He IS literally dead money against any top international player with a break anywhere near as good as his, in any decent length gambling match.

I'll say it right here and now.. Jason Shaw is the benificiary of the modern propensity to play all major events on looser pockets, with brand new cloth. His run and gun style plays well on this sort of equipment, but as evidenced by his performance against Aranas, the second he stops getting a straight in shot on the 1 or 2, he gets drilled. As opposed to Efren in his prime.. Efren was most dangerous when there was a little play in most racks.

“Relatively” hahaha he’s done pretty well with “thinking” games in the past few years of plying them. No, he’s not an elite 1pocket player... who cares. But he can hold his own in any game. Calling him one dimensional is silly.

How many straight in shots did he have when he beat you at Derby in the first round? Probably a lot. #stillsalty
 
Last edited:
Meh. Shaw is an incomplete player. I mean.. His game is COMPLETELY based on shotmaking, which is why he is pretty much dead money in any game where thinking is required.

Which is why he wants absolutely no part of playing Justin Bergman on a tight table. Because he knows that he can't just shoot down his opponent in that sort of situation. And along that line of thinking, Bergman is smart enough to realize that Shaw will get antsy if he doesn't get many easy layouts in a row, and will be prime for Bergman to leave a few teaser sucker shots in a row for Shaw to shoot at..

Which Shaw WILL shoot at. He can't help himself.

Joshua Filler, on the other hand, shoots STRAIGHTER than Shaw, but looks to be developing as an overall player. Trying to get better at other games.. He gambled at DCC at Banks, barbox 8 ball, etc...

Sorry, but it's just my opinion that Shaw is way too one-dimensional as a player to be as arrogant as he is.

"incomplete player"
"dead money"
"one-dimensional"

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
 
“Relatively” hahaha he’s done pretty well with “thinking” games in the past few years of plying them. No, he’s not an elite 1pocket player... who cares. But he can hold his own in any game. Calling him one dimensional is silly.

How many straight in shots did he have when he beat you at Derby in the first round? Probably a lot. #stillsalty

Oh, I didn't like him much before we played, but for the record, since you asked....

He generally plowed through the middle of the rack on the cut break, hitting 2-3 balls in the rack area, and managed to get a straight in shot at the 1 or 2 a combined total of 6 times for simple runouts. When I finally caught a break and he left the 1 ball in the center of the top rail, forcing him to play safe... I kicked it good, kicking it (intentionally) towards a corner that was blocked by the 5/9. The 1/5 was so close together and offangle he lined up to hit the 1-5 carom off the back of the 9, since it laid natural.

He hit it so bad he overcut the 1 ball by a half ball and accidentally made the 9.

I don't mind being beat by a champion at all. It's the GAME that's broke. I came up in the game where no matter who you were, you had to come up to the breakshot, knock the shit out of them, WITH CONTROL, if you were gonna run racks. It pretty much doesn't matter where you rack the 9 ball, the template racks on slick cloth mean a ball is going in automatically, somewhere, if the rack is hit atthe proper angle. Template racks have ruined 9 ball as an effective challenge.
 
6-5 TRex......it was 7-7 ball count and Bustie let a safety leak a little bit.

JJ and Pags in the booth....they’re good together
 
Shaw is one of the baddest mofos out ther right now.

I really don't see how anyone could claim otherwise.
 
Back
Top