I never said I was looking for a $100 table. I have passed on many free or cheap tables. I want something that's solid, and part of that process is learning.
Did you know that when Brunswick introduced it, the Anniversary was positioned as a "value" table?" Neither did I. But it's still much more solid that many contemporary, high-priced tables around today. It's base frame appears to be the same as the GC; maybe the GC inherited it.
I think of the GC's in about what I'm willing to pay, a good GC IV might be the best buy, since it won't necessarily need new rubber, it has a better leveling system, and still the heavy frame. I have a line on a few GC IV's in the sub $3k neighborhood. We'll see.
I'd still like to know what else out thee has the desirable characteristics of the GC.
The Mission, which I think is quite attractive, seems the same internally as the Gibson, and as RKC points out, they sag, and are otherwise not that great.
If an Anniversary or Centennial came along, not too far away, and not too dear, I'd jump on it.
Did you know that when Brunswick introduced it, the Anniversary was positioned as a "value" table?" Neither did I. But it's still much more solid that many contemporary, high-priced tables around today. It's base frame appears to be the same as the GC; maybe the GC inherited it.
I think of the GC's in about what I'm willing to pay, a good GC IV might be the best buy, since it won't necessarily need new rubber, it has a better leveling system, and still the heavy frame. I have a line on a few GC IV's in the sub $3k neighborhood. We'll see.
I'd still like to know what else out thee has the desirable characteristics of the GC.
The Mission, which I think is quite attractive, seems the same internally as the Gibson, and as RKC points out, they sag, and are otherwise not that great.
If an Anniversary or Centennial came along, not too far away, and not too dear, I'd jump on it.