Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some things better left unsaid.

I think YOU mean:

Some things are better undone....as in YOU can't do it.

I believe you like to rain on other people's parades simply because you've never had a parade of your own.

Hey, I can relate. I'm no monster at 14.1 or any game for that matter but, I'm not gonna downgrade other people's accomplishments just because I can't get there.

By doing so, it makes you a very, very small person.

JMO, but...I'm pretty sure most reasonable people agree with my assumption.

Jeff
 
I think YOU mean:

Some things are better undone....as in YOU can't do it.

I believe you like to rain on other people's parades simply because you've never had a parade of your own.

Hey, I can relate. I'm no monster at 14.1 or any game for that matter but, I'm not gonna downgrade other people's accomplishments just because I can't get there.

By doing so, it makes you a very, very small person.

JMO, but...I'm pretty sure most reasonable people agree with my assumption.

Jeff


I don't.

And frankly, I haven't seen him post anything to justify your amateur psychoanalysis in which you broadly assert he's jealous and has no accomplishments of his own.

Lou Figueroa
 
I don't.

And frankly, I haven't seen him post anything to justify your amateur psychoanalysis in which you broadly assert he's jealous and has no accomplishments of his own.

Lou Figueroa

What if you had some evidence though?

Like perhaps one of the few long-standing organizations focused on anything having to do with billiards, who endorsed as true?
 
Look in the mirror, if you need a boxing reminder, turkey. I've thrown away better rakes

The last few post by you are purely insults directed at Azb members and at pro pool in general.

It appears you have either run out of material in support of your position, or you are only here to troll.

If it's the latter, you should prob go ahead an ban yourself.
 
What if you had some evidence though?

Like perhaps one of the few long-standing organizations focused on anything having to do with billiards, who endorsed as true?


That would have absolutely nothing to do with the assertions made by JC.

And oh by the way, the BCA is more about selling pool tables and hot tubs at their expo nowadays than much to do about pool.

Lou Figueroa
 
That would have absolutely nothing to do with the assertions made by JC.

And oh by the way, the BCA is more about selling pool tables and hot tubs at their expo nowadays than much to do about pool.

Lou Figueroa

So predictable.

There is indication that 626 happened. It just doesn't meet your standard.

The bca is as close to an official organization as pool has and it has a long history of devotion to the game. Its current operational focus has little-to-zero to do with those facts.
 
The two people at the BCA who saw the video, Shane and Rob, are still there.

This post from bob says post #421 here in the thread, but on the main forum it said it was post 420. Do we think Big Pharma is behind this? Trying to make it seem like everyone is going 420 crazy 😜 to rile up the new treetotalers, possibly pushing them to rash action?

It’s the most likely scenario for the post count discrepancy and if no one can provide me evidence otherwise I’ll have to assume the pharmaceutical company heads have infiltrated us.

See ya guys for a bit. It’s been real
 
semi public vs general ""

John Schmidt worked for a year to do this. Ran 400 plus runs numberous times. He ran 626 and filmed it. His arch nemesis wants to throw shade on him and calls him a liar. I know who I believe.

You should get a job a nyslimes =- they will probly hire u. I do find it kinda' odd bout how his live stream practice was so well touted - then came the closed pool room mystery tape with exactly 100 more than Mosconi - no live coverage + hidden raw tape footage (squirrely'). We are not debating if he filmed it, were simply asking to see unedited proof - i don't think that is too much to ask. Also it is very odd that the "claim" was made public close to a year ago and maybe 50 or 60 people have seen the footage. The bca's "claim" will remain nothing morethan that till the proper powers at b have studied the raw footage of their mystery tape. Till then their just media rodents looking for a slice of fame - also using past documented official record as a pedestal for their corruption. Extraordinary "claims" require extraordinary evidence - I see no definitive evidence their claim is even close to a sports history record.
 
Last edited:
Who are the "proper powers at b"?

You know...his Navy buddy who is willing to risk misappropriation of government resources to catch John Schmidt in a sham.

Oh, I mean to potentially catch John.

For the honor of 526...:rolleyes::scratchhead::killingme:
 
You know...his Navy buddy who is willing to risk misappropriation of government resources to catch John Schmidt in a sham.

Oh, I mean to potentially catch John.

For the honor of 526...:rolleyes::scratchhead::killingme:

And I am sure we be able to vet the Navy guy. Surely Danny will share his name, rank and office location...and training re: video analysis.
 
I have an answer

Who are the "proper powers at b"?

Please go back and reread the thread as that has already been covered, i don't like to repeat myself. Were u listening to the dude's conversation? We have already covered that.
 
Last edited:
Please go back and reread the thread as that has already been covered, i don't like to repeat myself. Were u listening to the dude's conversation?
You obviously do like to repeat yourself as you started a new thread about the same subject even though the other one had hundreds of posts, and you repeat the same boring and played-out insults over and over again.
 
Last edited:
Yes

True, we have no evidence of table doctoring, and you have every right to reject that claim as "factual" since you have seen no evidence affirming it, but neither has it been proven to be unaltered, so it does, in fact, remain a "possibility". And while you are wise enough to demand "proof" concerning the table, are you also wise enough to demand the video "proof" concerning the run itself?

My short answer here is - Yes.
 
Yer posts are not relevent

You obviously do like to repeat yourself as you started a new thread about the same subject even though the other one had hundreds of posts, and you repeat the same boring and played-out insults over and over again.

Its becoming very clear that yer post are not of any real relevance. My other post was in 14.1 section - only had a few hundred views. Another 14.1 purist suggested I move it to main forum - so I did and it has been seen from thousands. Does that bother u - or possibly make ur job more uncomfortable - i sense much fear from (powers at b) for knot' allowing the public to see proof of un edited footage? :-( First they can provide evidence to their "claim" then we can talk about why they chose the 9' - when Mosconi's was accomplished on the 8'.
 
Last edited:
You should get a job a nyslimes =- they will probly hire u. I do find it kinda' odd bout how his live stream practice was so well touted - then came the closed pool room mystery tape with exactly 100 more than Mosconi - no live coverage + hidden raw tape footage (squirrely'). We are not debating if he filmed it, were simply asking to see unedited proof - i don't think that is too much to ask. Also it is very odd that the "claim" was made public close to a year ago and maybe 50 or 60 people have seen the footage. The bca's "claim" will remain nothing morethan that till the proper powers at b have studied the raw footage of their mystery tape. Till then their just media rodents looking for a slice of fame - also using past documented official record as a pedestal for their corruption. Extraordinary "claims" require extraordinary evidence - I see no definitive evidence their claim is even close to a sports history record.

I have responded to why it wasn't live streamed several times. You seem to have just ignored it.

Just have a viewing party. I bet enough of us would chip in to pay for your slot if we could get your review of the tape after seeing it.

Just tired of this whole he didn't do it, but if he did do it, then the table must have been doctored in some way.

You also claim running balls on an 8 footer is tougher even though you don't have access to an 8 footer. Most other straight pool players say that 8 foot is easier than 9 foot. Would you say that 10 foot is tougher than 9 foot? By your logic, 10 foot should be easier because your cue ball control doesn't have to be precise and there are less clusters.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: KRJ
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top