The other day I responded to a similar post regarding a cue purchase. This same kind of complaint is, unfortunately, not uncommon on this site. Permit me to make basically the same point here as I did the other day. I’m a criminal defense lawyer of nearly forty years experience and have handled hundreds of theft and fraud cases. I’d like to address, from a lawyer’s perspective, the all too common issue of a seller not sending a purchased cue, not returning a deposit, keeping a cue that was sent in (as here), etc. I’m not as experienced on the civil side, but I have a clue and I’m not trying to advise anyone on a specific case; just making some general observations from forty years in the legal system.
While various legal approaches to the “where is my cue” disputes are possible they will usually fail as practical matter. Could criminal charges be pursued? Yes, but individual citizens don’t ultimately press criminal charges. Although many are under the impression that they can “press charges” or “take out a warrant” against someone who has victimized them, what the individual actually does is fill out a sworn affidavit containing the facts which they feel constitute a crime. A prosecutor then reviews it and decides whether to pursue the matter. The prosecutor has complete discretion on whether to pursue a charge or not. Most cue transaction-type issues as seen on this site constitute, a low level property offense, usually a misdemeanor. As a practical matter, most prosecutors are not going to undertake the prosecution of a case that to them, not to you, is a low-level, multi-jurisdiction property offense. They would either have to seek the extradition of an out-of-state defendant (seller, repairer, etc.) into the customer’s state or, if they were in the seller/repairer’s state, fly in the customer as a witness. In neither instance will they do it on a property offense involving only a few hundred dollars. It will look to the prosecutor like a contract dispute and he will most likely tell the aggrieved party to pursue civil remedies. Extraditions and flying in out-of-state witnesses on misdemeanors or low-level felonies are almost unheard of.
On the civil side, these type issues are, at their root, a contract dispute. An attorney will not get involved on a contingency basis so he can take a third or forty percent of a judgement in the hundreds or low thousands of dollars and the plaintiff is probably not going to want to pay an attorney three or four hundred dollars an hour on a straight fee basis. Bottom line, the plaintiff will end up having to represent himself and will soon be swimming in a procedural maze involving multiple jurisdictions. A lay person would be hard pressed to figure out how to appropriately get service on an out -of-state party, much less how to execute on an out-of-state judgment if they were fortunate enough to get one. Even if a plaintiff got a judgment, it would be virtually worthless unless he wanted to spend more money than the amount of the judgment. Are there ways to theoretically make this work? Yes. Are they worth the money, and maybe more importantly, the time to bring them to a successful conclusion. Most likely not.
Unless a cue dispute involves thousands of dollars or the seller or repair person is in the same state as the customer, there are unfortunately no practical ways to get relief through the court systems.