How do these diamond tables play so badly? vid

and he is putting a touch of right spin on the ball.
Yep. Not knocking the shooter … says he’s an experienced player …. If so he would be able to self diagnose/adjust. It’s very unfair to fault the table. I’d like to see a fine tuned A player or pro evaluate. The OP was asking for the variables…
So far:
Real King’s input
Off Center hit
Hitting target high
Do any other AZB members play in that room?
 
Standard nose height is 1.406" which is 62.5% of a standard 2 1/4" ball. Diamond tables are typically 1.453".

To explain why it is that you may not like the way that Diamond tables play:
Diamond tables require a higher nose height because they use Artemis cushions, installed upside-down. Installing the cushion with the rounded surface facing down creates a lower contact point on the ball, than if the flat side of the cushion were facing down. This creates inconsistency in rebound speed, dependent on the speed at which a ball hits the cushion. This is also why Diamond tables tend to bank short.
Thank you Sir!
I always preferred GC's when banking.
I smile when PRO's go SAFE rather than bank sometimes on Diamond tables.
 
I'd like to hear from someone who knows wtf they are talking about. A table mechanic, diamond rep, etc. because these tables are screwed up. Not trying to argue about other things here
Not only the angle the ball rebounds at but the speed of those cushions is ridiculous. The ball actually gains speed after striking the cushion - like pinball bumpers!
 
CB literally stalled off of the 2nd rail. Needed a little more speed on the hit. Diamonds do not bank like GC's.
 
Standard nose height is 1.406" which is 62.5% of a standard 2 1/4" ball. Diamond tables are typically 1.453".

To explain why it is that you may not like the way that Diamond tables play:
Diamond tables require a higher nose height because they use Artemis cushions, installed upside-down. Installing the cushion with the rounded surface facing down creates a lower contact point on the ball, than if the flat side of the cushion were facing down. This creates inconsistency in rebound speed, dependent on the speed at which a ball hits the cushion. This is also why Diamond tables tend to bank short.
The barboxes have Artemis or diamond black?
Artemis are installed upside down on the blue label?
 
Changed out for what???? With what???? 40 tables to an 18 wheeler load, being taken to tournaments, set up, over and over again, what did they do, make a pit stop somewhere and unload all the tables, change out the rails with God only knows what, then loaded them back up, and on to the next tournament!!!!

And you're full of shit with the humidity.

I just checked the humidity level right now in Temple, TX and it's at 97% buddy!

View attachment 718887
You do realize what rain does? Also this video was from last week...when it wasn't raining. lol
 
The barboxes have Artemis or diamond black?
Artemis are installed upside down on the blue label?
That has been answered, the 7ft use the Diamond Black.

I seem to remember it being clarified in another thread that the Artemis are not installed upside down on the 8 or 9ft.
 
That has been answered, the 7ft use the Diamond Black.

I seem to remember it being clarified in another thread that the Artemis are not installed upside down on the 8 or 9ft.
Artemis is not installed upside down from the factory.
But, I know two mechs who argue they should be upside down.
 
I'm asking. Nobody knows everything. So yes I scoff at people who think that they are all knowing

I've played thousands of games on diamond tables. There is something very wrong with these ones in particular
Buddy, I don't claim to know something about everything, but I do know pool tables, how they play, how they're built, and cloth, so in MY field of EXPERTISE, I AM an expert, and any advice I DO give, I give with EXPERT knowledge, like it or not, that's the facts!!!
 
Buddy, I don't claim to know something about everything, but I do know pool tables, how they play, how they're built, and cloth, so in MY field of EXPERTISE, I AM an expert, and any advice I DO give, I give with EXPERT knowledge, like it or not, that's the facts!!!
Happiness is FREE great advice. We enjoy having you as our Go To. Thanks.
 
I don't see this "right" english applied to the shot. Cue is barely off center in view because of the camera angle. Even with that pointed out. Checking a CB with inside with such a steep angle generally just skids and has nearly no effect on fresh cloth.

Frame before strike:
1.png

Player does have horrible aim for someone attempting to demonstrate a table banking short. Clearly he hits the rail above the diamond.
Frame before bank:
2.png

Despite the horrible aim, this ball banks well short. Way more than what geometry tells us it should.
Frame before second rail:
3.png


I don't care how many times you've saved money with Geico or stayed in a Holiday Inn Expressview. This ball banks incredibly short and I have never witness humidity or ball condition produce such behaviour. However this is the norm on the red label offerings.
 
I hated diamond tables when they first came out, my banking and kicking were way off. Then I discovered a secret. If you hit the shot at the correct speed, the banks are fine, You just can't get away with waaay too slow or too fast, like you can on say a Brunswick. It really shows up on back up banks . Shooting a 2 railer down low on Brunswicks is usually impossible, the ball usually starts creeping back up the table after the second rail, the same shot goes as predicted on a Diamond though. My thoughts on this may have zero to do with reality, but it made it so that I could predict where the ball was going at a much higher rate, which is the goal , correct?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top