WPA bans......................

Make payouts a dollar. With a $24,999 appearance fee or donation. Sure Matchroom legal team isn't the least bit scared of the WPA.
The WPA has been run by one man out of apartment in Australia for decades. Matchroom is a real company with offices and staff. They are a real organization dedicated to producing professional sporting events to be shown on television all around the world, not just someone looking for a sanction fee handout from every promoter. It's no contest here!
 
Biado ended up playing in the Hanoi Open. His wife on a livestream action match during the US Open said he had withdrawn due to ACBS. Good to see him play.

The Germans are there minus Filler.

Tons of Asians are there including Taiwan.

It seems most players are choosing MR.
 
Biado ended up playing in the Hanoi Open. His wife on a livestream action match during the US Open said he had withdrawn due to ACBS. Good to see him play.

The Germans are there minus Filler.

Tons of Asians are there including Taiwan.

It seems most players are choosing MR.
The WPA is like the Titanic right after it hit the iceberg, it doesn't know its sinking yet.
 
The WPA is like the Titanic right after it hit the iceberg, it doesn't know its sinking yet.
Right! But here, the WPA was like "I bet I can take on this iceberg, heh" and drove right into it on purpose, arguing that doing so was the for good of the passengers. I guess if they find themselves out of a job they can look forward to a long successful career as politicians.
 
I count 27 byes in the Hanoi Open. Several were Vietnamese players that No Started. Several were "qualifiers" that were never filled with a name. However in the window's open podcast, one of them (I believe Mike P) stated that the actual qualifier winners were put in the bracket as their name, so these "qualifier" entries might have been further withdraws.
 
Meanwhile...

Cut and paste what I wrote in the other thread about this:

Pot meet kettle.

This is why on POOL MR has in their contract that they can restrict player's tournament choices. HOWEVER, the situation is a bit different. The Snooker players have a complete tour. They do allow the players to play in non MR snooker events, as long as they don't clash with a MR snooker event. That makes sense, because the whole MR tour is cohesive, and is a single package presented to the players, fans, and sponsors.

It would be like half of the NFL players skipping a few games to play in Arena Football.

If MR does this in pool, I would imagine they would first have a complete season of major events, with each player guaranteed a minimum yearly income in either prize money or direct payment. That would still rub some players and fans the wrong way, but at least pool would be in a much better place overall than now.
 
This is like watching two bald men fighting over a comb. Pool is such a fractured industry as far as mainstream sports.
Yes, unfortunately true it is fractured and for as long as I can remember back in the 80's. At least MR has been improving the public face. We need a good public face to bring along the money... more televised professional events etc. What happened to choice...WPA just dug their own grave. Players will opt out.
 
the absolute hipocrisy in saying they protect the players while at the same time leaning against qatar and congregate 128 players in qatar is becoming more disturbing by the day. now the hamas leaders, based in doha in qatar, is drumming for full out jihad and war:


that's in the same city as the qatar open.

how far away from direct danger were those players, WPA?
 
the absolute hipocrisy in saying they protect the players while at the same time leaning against qatar and congregate 128 players in qatar is becoming more disturbing by the day. now the hamas leaders, based in doha in qatar, is drumming for full out jihad and war:


that's in the same city as the qatar open.

how far away from direct danger were those players, WPA?
Life threatening? Probably none. They played under the auspices of the local leadership. Political fallout? Who knows? Maybe nothing, maybe a few years climbing out of an annoying hole. I'd watch the winner boards for any emerging patterns.
 
Life threatening? Probably none. They played under the auspices of the local leadership. Political fallout? Who knows? Maybe nothing, maybe a few years climbing out of an annoying hole. I'd watch the winner boards for any emerging patterns.

how is it not life threatening to play pool in the near vicinity of a terror organization? an organization that the "local leadership" is currently harboring. israeli targeted killings have previously included teheran, dubai, damascus and tunisia. dubai is nextdoors to qatar. did WPA inform the players of this danger at all?
 
Life threatening? Probably none. They played under the auspices of the local leadership. Political fallout? Who knows? Maybe nothing, maybe a few years climbing out of an annoying hole. I'd watch the winner boards for any emerging patterns.
Regardless the 'optics' are not good. With the attacks on Israel even the mere whiff of association will have big-time negative fallout.
 
how is it not life threatening to play pool in the near vicinity of a terror organization? an organization that the "local leadership" is currently harboring. israeli targeted killings have previously included teheran, dubai, damascus and tunisia. dubai is nextdoors to qatar. did WPA inform the players of this danger at all?
not to defend anyone here but the fact that Qatar is the home office of Hamas is not news. haven't heard one player say they felt it was dangerous to go. don't think that event will happen again now in light of those asswipes killing civilians like that. Any credibility Qatar may have had probably just evaporated.
 
how is it not life threatening to play pool in the near vicinity of a terror organization? an organization that the "local leadership" is currently harboring. israeli targeted killings have previously included teheran, dubai, damascus and tunisia. dubai is nextdoors to qatar. did WPA inform the players of this danger at all?
A pool tournament, even with the Sheiks in attendance seems like a lousy target. IDK Me no strategist.
 
Here is an interesting article on the bans that some "rogue' snooker players were looking at because they were going to play in an exhibition in China that conflicted with a tour event. The bottom line is that if you have an organized tour that people actually watch -- that is, you have a saleable product -- there will likely be the chances of bans.

 
Here is an interesting article on the bans that some "rogue' snooker players were looking at because they were going to play in an exhibition in China that conflicted with a tour event. The bottom line is that if you have an organized tour that people actually watch -- that is, you have a saleable product -- there will likely be the chances of bans.

Macau event WST notice: https://wst.tv/wst-statement-update/ Looks like MR has the willingness to work these situations out. IDK if the WPA does.
 
Back
Top