WPA Bans 245 Players

I'm afraid not. MR has been saved from ifself by the conservative British audience many times. Othervise snooker would not have been recognizable today. Who will save pool from their inventions?
Fwiw they're still a better custodian of pool than WPA.
HUH??? If it wasn't for Hearn&Co. and the 'beebs 'PotBlack' snooker would still be stuck away in shitty old parlors at the end of some alley in Shitshire England. All the guys that became wealthy should send him xmas/birthday cards for life.
 
HUH??? If it wasn't for Hearn&Co. and the 'beebs 'PotBlack' snooker would still be stuck away in shitty old parlors at the end of some alley in Shitshire England. All the guys that became wealthy should send him xmas/birthday cards for life.
Then again snooker could have been this, now, if the audience hadn't rejected it:
They also tried to add an extra coloured ball a while back, but I can't find video of it. Point is, they've tried to change the game drastically many times and the audience rejected it.
 
Last edited:
Can we at least agree that the black-freckled cueball is better than the measles cueball?
(For the love of god though, anything but a CB with a single f-ing dot on it...)
Yes it’s much better. I like that CB a lot. The balls are good, the colors are the issue. 😃😃
 
Then again snooker could have been this, now, if the audience hadn't rejected it:
They also tried to add an extra coloured ball a while back, but I can't find video of it. Point is, they've tried to change the game drastically many times and the audience rejected it.
Wow, that is nuts. That's like Bonus Ball. A bunch of stupid rules, and can't be played by normal people at a club.
 
I'd prefer the classic blue-circle that comes with Centennials. No one cares about those fkng dots/spots/flecks. Just another sales gimmick aimed at suckers.
I really like the 6-spot cueball. Gives me a better visual of what it's doing. I keep my Tournament Black CB in my case and use it everywhere i go.
Not a huge fan of the appearance of the Arcos II balls, but i've never played with them either.
 
Matchroom could have easily sanctioned their events while following the exact same path they are on now. Then they could have achieved the commercial success they’re striving for alongside the WPA. And once they achieved that and made millionaires of their players, they could have dropped the sanctioning and told the WPA their international subsidization was no longer needed and cut ties then. Same outcome but more assistance and opportunities along the way. Instead the players will have to struggle a little more during the journey than they would have otherwise.
I would be shocked if this dispute ends soon or easily, absent a near full surrender by the WPA. Wishful thinking imo.

The WPA has said the dispute is not about sanctioning anymore, if I recall correctly, and whatever the case, the standoff really revolves around control/calendar.

By sanctioning tournaments, the WPA has some control over the dates that promoters can use. That's a powerful tool.

Matchroom doesn't want to cede that control. It's tour is big and growing, and is complicated to set up: The venues, the broadcast partners, the marketing. Especially while it is young and growing, MR needs flexibility to stage its events, and naturally it wants the best dates possible.

Just look at how difficult it was for MR to set up the Reyes Cup. Ideally it would not have started two days after the Hanoi Open, but that's how it ended up. I would guess MR got penned in by the complexity of the matter.

Giving the WPA a big say in the calendar limits MR's flexibility, all to appease other promotors who are effectively competitors who invest far less in the game.

Most of the other promoters aren't really doing anything to try to grow the game and bring in a new audience. Pro pool needs broader media reach to achieve more success and can't be stuck on just Youtube and obscure pay-for websites. MR gets it.

EDIT: I forgot to add, WPA wants calendar control to get sanctioning money from OTHER promoters.

What good is its sanctioning authority, however, if MR ignores the WPA and schedules events when it wants. Other promoters could lose out and then question why they are paying the WPA sanctioning fees themselves.
 
Last edited:
Have you seen a full set??? How 'bout that 9ball brother????????? This was Emily 'piss markin' her territory as the new major-domo of MR 9ball. That being said its one of the few fk-ups they've done so far. Pro pool would be stuck in neutral if it wasn't for MR. I'll give 'em a pass, kinda, on these horrid spheres.
Well you know what they say..."any press is good press" and there's no doubt that it caused discussion. As much as I hate the purple five (like, I'm up there with Fatboy on my hatred of it), I'd have to disagree with you on it being a f$% up. I think it's served its purpose.

Jaden
 
I would be shocked if this dispute ends soon or easily, absent a near full surrender by the WPA. Wishful thinking imo.

The WPA has said the dispute is not about sanctioning anymore, if I recall correctly, and whatever the case, the standoff really revolves around control/calendar.

By sanctioning tournaments, the WPA has some control over the dates that promoters can use. That's a powerful tool.

Matchroom doesn't want to cede that control. It's tour is big and growing, and is complicated to set up: The venues, the broadcast partners, the marketing. Especially while it is young and growing, MR needs flexibility to stage its events.

Just look at how difficult it was for MR to set up the Reyes Cup. Ideally it would not have started two days after the Hanoi Open, but that's how it ended up. I would guess MR got penned in by the complexity of the matter.

Giving the WPA a big say in the calendar limits MR's flexibility, all to appease other promotors who are effectively competitors who invest far less in the game.

Most of the other promoters aren't really doing anything to try to grow the game and bring in a new audience. Pro pool needs broader media reach to achieve more success and can't be stuck on just Youtube and obscure pay-for websites. MR gets it.
Well and that's the reality. So long as MR is the big dawg and putting the money for promotion, payouts, etc, everyone needs to move their schedule around them and really that's just the way it is.

The one's with the cash will win out in the end if their model is viable at all and considering what they did with snooker, it appears to be.

Jaden
 
I agree in part to what you are saying. Unfortunately, MR will have the power to change how the game is played unilaterally. Ball colors, pocket sizes, cloth color/speed, rail speed/profiles, and other important aspects of the game will largely be determined by the pro game. They can and will be changed very quickly which will not be a good thing for the game long term. We don't need 15 rule changes in a year. MR has done an admirable job with snooker, but my fear is that they do not respect the integrity of the pool game like they do snooker, and certain decisions has confirmed this. The infamous 5 ball debacle, for one. The fact is that when a sport is completely at the mercy of a private, commercial entity, that means that we must weather any ludicrous edict with no possible appeal, like being at the court of a sovereign King of the middle ages.

I worry that pool will be a constant testbed for harebrained ideas and never will properly stabilize. It is important for the development of a sport, to have a relatively stable rule set, in order for skills to increase and strategy to progress, not to mention being recognizable and understandable for the viewing public.
What major sport is not at the mercy of a private, commercial entity? The Premier League is private. All major U.S. leagues are compilations of privately owned teams.

Why should pool be any different? Is there a popular sports league that is publicly owned or owned by a nonprofit group? I am unaware.

All these sports, by the way, have constantly made changes in the rules. And sometimes very big ones. Soccer is the most conservative, but now they use goalline technology and five subs.

The game of pool still looks pretty much the same to me in MR tourneys. Color of the balls? Please. A cosmetic issue. Breakbox? Great idea. Tighter pockets? OK, but only up to a point. I'd be fine with 4 or 4 1/4 inch. Players are adapting just fine.
 
Well and that's the reality. So long as MR is the big dawg and putting the money for promotion, payouts, etc, everyone needs to move their schedule around them and really that's just the way it is.

The one's with the cash will win out in the end if their model is viable at all and considering what they did with snooker, it appears to be.

Jaden
Exactly. People keep whining about schedule slots. Wake the hell up folks, its competition for market share. WTF would MR give two shits what Predator wants as to choice scheduling slots?? If Pred's product gets good enough then they'll land their spots but right now MR is swinging the biggest bat.
 
I really like the 6-spot cueball. Gives me a better visual of what it's doing. I keep my Tournament Black CB in my case and use it everywhere i go.
Not a huge fan of the appearance of the Arcos II balls, but i've never played with them either.
I don't know one player that uses the spots to judge what they're doing. You can tell simply by how the ball reacts. The whole reason measel balls were invented was to 'supposedly' allow viewers to tell. The jury is still out on that. Another sales gimmick. People played for a LONG time with no spots with zero ill effects. I've used them and have never paid any attention to how the spots move relative to how i hit it.
 
Then again snooker could have been this, now, if the audience hadn't rejected it:
They also tried to add an extra coloured ball a while back, but I can't find video of it. Point is, they've tried to change the game drastically many times and the audience rejected it.
Still, the bottom line is without MR the purses would be way smaller and much less attention paid to the game. I'll take your word for all of this as i can watch about an hour of snooooooooker before i'm dead asleep. Only thing more boring is Chinese8ball. Its close tho. If O'sullivan isn't playing i even have less desire to watch these young robots drone on. Pool is getting same way. Must be against the rules these days to have any personality.
 
I tend to agree but i too won't buy DAZN. Has nothing to do with cheap/miserable just the fact they suck to deal with. I had it once before for the Mosconi and getting it cancelled was worse than getting a tooth pulled. I don't want/need it year round. Never again.
I'm riding free this year
..... still even the $250 a year is stealing for all this pool plus some boxing
 
Back
Top