3Which version is that Brunswick GC?
Just count them from the old “The Snap” magazines. But, Having grown up subscribed to them, I remember Mike’s name on the lists ALOT more than Nicks.Okay on Sigel vs Varner...
I would like nothing more than to really know what their head-to-head record was. There's no surprise that Sigel was the better of the two at 14.1, since he grew up right in the heart of 14.1 country. While Varner was a more Midwestern boy who I imagine played his fair share of 14.1, but rounded out his game with banks and one-pocket.
I've looked at their career achievements that are listed in Wikipedia (which look like a good starting point) and I wouldn't argue that Varner had the better career, but I would maybe argue that they were both monster freighters chugging along right past each other in the night. Of course they would anchor at the same port from time to time but they both moved a lot of cargo! Their achievements are quite comparable. I'd say Varner maybe had a little longer run but they were both pretty hot for almost 20 years.
The times were so different, I suspect that they weren't always even competing at the same time and place. In today's world, everybody knows about EVERY SINGLE tournament under the sun. Did they back then? How did these guys fill out their playing schedules? They obviously played a lot of the same majors but you wonder how many times they actually locked horns.
Would someone please get these two together for a podcast? I would love to hear them discuss their careers. They would maybe have to use a chess clock to keep it fair to Varner.
***Edit***
Just went ahead and started new thread.
I've heard a lot about Irish from many, and the feeling was that the legend was a little bigger than the man.I have heard it said that the one guy no one of that bygone era wanted to play was Johnny "Irish" Lineen.
Lou Figueroa
I actually played Johnny Irish at the 7/11 a couple of times in the mid 1960's. He was a sixtyish bald headed small man, maybe 5'6 or 7. I didn't have any idea who he was, but he always asked me to play when I came in. He knew I was a $2 player back then but he didn't care. He wanted to win my $10 and he did a couple of times. Jersey Red finally told me that this old man was once the best player in New York. That made me feel good.I've heard a lot about Irish from many, and the feeling was that the legend was a little bigger than the man.
That said, he had a top gear that was hard to match and was a threat to beat any player in the world. I was told that his special sauce was that he could play his top speed on practically no sleep. This made him perfect for "ahead races."
An article by R.A. Dyer in Billiards Digest says the 1961 event had 14 players, with Johnny Vevis (Vives) first, Jimmy Moore second, and Hubert Cokes third.I don't make this stuff up!
Rags died in 1960. The first Johnston City was in 1961 and was only a One Pocket tournament with sixteen players. "Connecticut" Johnny Vevis won it. I think he beat Marshall "Squirrel" Carpenter in the finals and Fats was third. Not 100% on that, but I know Johnny won.
Thanks for that. At least I got the winner right. I was guessing on the other two. Almost 100% sure that is the only one Fats played in. Maybe he was 4th.An article by R.A. Dyer in Billiards Digest says the 1961 event had 14 players, with Johnny Vevis (Vives) first, Jimmy Moore second, and Hubert Cokes third.
I assume Red meant New York City. The best player in New York state during the prime of Johnny Irish was always Irving Crane.Jersey Red finally told me that this old man was once the best player in New York. That made me feel good.
Yes, onepocket.org has Fats finishing 4th. https://www.onepocket.org/FatsHOFpage.htmThanks for that. At least I got the winner right. I was guessing on the other two. Almost 100% sure that is the only one Fats played in. Maybe he was 4th.
I think Irish's real name was Johnny Lineen. He did play in a few of the big 14.1 tournaments back then and finished in the middle of the pack as I recall. He was a money player and focused on 9-Ball and One Pocket. The only big pool tournaments in the 30's, 40's and 50's were Straight Pool, and there were several of them each year. Sometime in the late 1950's a couple of Southern promoters (Gandy) put on a couple of 9-Ball and One Pocket events. Their success led to Johnston City in 1961, and the advent of the modern era in Pool.yea he meant nyc. most just called n.y.c. new york as it was two different worlds.
and irving crane was certainly the best player from new york and one of the top three in the world probably.
but he wasnt ever in the conversation as he wasnt a gambler so much. and when people talk about best players they couldnt care less about a tournament player, as they do and idolize now.
maybe the best straight pool player that ever lived was mike euphemia. he wasnt much of a gambler but ran more balls than anyone alive.
no one hardly mentions him as one of the best players.
Here's an article from onepocket.org with a chart showing the winners of each discipline each year at Johnston City. Eufemia is not on the chart -- https://www.onepocket.org/JohnstonCity.htm.... It's important to remember that even at Johnston City, Straight Pool was one of the three disciplines. I'm pretty sure Eufemia won at least one of them. ...
Yep!Here's an article from onepocket.org with a chart showing the winners of each discipline each year at Johnston City. Eufemia is not on the chart -- https://www.onepocket.org/JohnstonCity.htm.
But it looks like Eufemia did win the 14.1 event at the 1967 Stardust Open. Perhaps that's the one you are remembering -- https://onepocket.org/forum/index.php?threads/stardust-results.430067/#post-439922.