Since so many top pros that never or hardly ever played these games have won or did very well in tournaments and action in the last few years, do you think 14.1 and 1-hole players are making it sound so much harder than it really is? Johnnyt
Since so many top pros that never or hardly ever played these games have won or did very well in tournaments and action in the last few years, do you think 14.1 and 1-hole players are making it sound so much harder than it really is? Johnnyt
Mr. Johnnyt, the day will eventually come when you will say "I love one pocket". I'll give you a couple of more years.
It's all opinion. How do you compare?
What's the equivalent skill level in each game?
For example, what's the equivalent of a 100 ball run in straight pool for 10 ball? Is it a 10 pack? I would think it's more like a 4 pack, but that's just me. It's certainly not a 10 pack. That would be way harder than a 100 ball run in 14.1. Would any one argue that running 10 balls randomly is harder than running them in order? I doubt it. Does that mean 10 ball is harder? I don't think so. They are just different games. It's interesting to discuss, but who can offer proof in lieu of opinion?
100 ball high run is about equivalent to a A- 9ball speed. No, you can't compare runs in either game but you can make comparative assessments to a player's 9ball speed.
With a bit of practice or observation, an player like Earl should have a high run over 300, barring nincompoop table management. And all your TOP 9ballers should run almost that minimum. I have observed that your top players simply DON'T MISS, and that your other 9ballers who are considered great at 14.1 and are pro/open players but not top tier, eventually do miss.
theoretically 1 hole should be the truest test of skill...
but in reality it's 14.1..
and the reason is quite simple.. 1 hole is FAR more equipment dependent..which is exactly why the gamblers like it..it adds random chance to the equation....
theoretically 1 hole should be the truest test of skill...
but in reality it's 14.1..
and the reason is quite simple.. 1 hole is FAR more equipment dependent..which is exactly why the gamblers like it..it adds random chance to the equation....
They are different types of games, hard to compare as one being more difficult then the other TBH. 1-pocket is a slow game where you are not always trying to pot a ball and where you are not always under the gun to run out or lose. It is a thinking game and TBH there are alot of players I think I would have a better chance at beating in 1-pocket then in rotation pool because I can think through it. In rotation pool it largely comes down to stroke, the guy who strokes the ball better is a favorite, period. Rotation pool is VERY demanding on your fundamentals and pure shooting ability, 1-pocket is less dependent on shooting ability to a degree but requires alot more ingenuity and knowledge and patience.