Top 10 U.S players is way way less. Sub 30K for U.S players.
Yes, it's way less. Didn't think he meant just the U.S players. Johnnyt
Top 10 U.S players is way way less. Sub 30K for U.S players.
Paying this deep is ridiculous.
Pay the top 10% like poker. Make cashing mean something.
If they paid top 16 only that would of been $120,000 more to the top guys.
Simply by not paying out people who took home $2,500 or less.
Who the hell goes to a world championship and gives the littlest shit about $2500?
The players who have ZERO shot at winning it. They care about the $2500.
What it SHOULD be IMO is that each country sends their national champions and those players battle it out for the WORLD championships. As it is now ANYONE can go and play in the WC if they win a qualifier.
Make the people who will be world champions prove that they are the best in their countries first. Then pay out the top guy something like 300-500k.
Fantasies abound.
You mean pool pool players aren't also in the middle of a playoff that pays 10 millions bucks to the winner?
If you take away SVB's earnings, what would the average of the other top ten US players income be for this year? 30k? 20K?
Take Shane away and the next 10 average about 57k a year if my math is correct. Also this year still has 3 + months left. Johnnyt
Is going to be really watered down.
Sending one player from the,Philippines? How's that work. The other 5 are going to be replaced by the Chilean champ, the Afghani champ, the kazak champ?
Only the best players should compete, even if they turn out to be from just a few countries.
The $2500 guarantees that these top players who can't win, will at least come knowing they aren't going to lose money. I know the flight from NY to Qatar, with 2 stops, was $1200 round trip.
Tournaments have a choice in being top heavy or to pay deep. Themtopmheavy events are attractive to the dozen or so guys that have a Bon a Fide chance of winning. The ones that pay deep appeal to,everyone.
Things are changing in the US. You will see fewer "pros" but those that are there will make more money. Least thats how I see it shaking out.
The days of open tournaments relying on 96-128 man fields are about over. You will see things go more toward Matchroom style invitationals / TAR type matches. The players who have been grinding out events cashing top 16 and occasionally getting a 4th or 5th will have a hard road. (Not that its easy now).
One big problem IMO with pro pool in the US is there really is no such thing. There is no bar to entry. If you have 50 guys chopping up available money no one does very well. Split that money between 16 guys and it starts to look better. This also would make being a "pro" actually have some value.
Unless Bonus Ball comes back and saves the day first.
I agree that starting with 16 man fields is the way to go. I also think they should play in a studio setting and play all events there. The money should be good enough for 16 players to move to that area. Also, I know that sponsors will be needed for this to work well, but I also think the entry fees should be between $500 and $1000 per event. Johnnyt
Its a world championship. If you cant find $2000 to go play the world championship of your sport then you probably shouldn't be allowed to in the first place.
Using the same payout method as Wild Bills Liqour Barn house league to keep the customers coming back just doesnt make a lot of sense to me.
The money should come from the sponsors and promotors. The players should only have to qualify.
it is pretty sad for pool, at least snooker guys got it right and increased payouts dramatically in the last few years (almost $400k for world title).
really hope pool officials will start increasing payouts for major championships
I agree that starting with 16 man fields is the way to go. I also think they should play in a studio setting and play all events there. The money should be good enough for 16 players to move to that area.
Things are changing in the US. You will see fewer "pros" but those that are there will make more money. Least thats how I see it shaking out.
The days of open tournaments relying on 96-128 man fields are about over. You will see things go more toward Matchroom style invitationals / TAR type matches. The players who have been grinding out events cashing top 16 and occasionally getting a 4th or 5th will have a hard road. (Not that its easy now).
One big problem IMO with pro pool in the US is there really is no such thing. There is no bar to entry. If you have 50 guys chopping up available money no one does very well. Split that money between 16 guys and it starts to look better. This also would make being a "pro" actually have some value.
Unless Bonus Ball comes back and saves the day first.
Golf was/is more of a rich man's game than pocket billiards.
The elder statesman of pocket billiards could have done something very similar to what the old golfers did.
Unfortunately they did not.
Hence, you have golf today vs pocket billiards today. As I said pocket billiards is nearly a century behind golf & multi, multi millions if not billions of dollars behind too.
They took two different roads way back when to different destinations.
Maybe the Sheiks are hurting for money out there in the sand.
Now they will be hosting it for four more years.