Good interview. A bit simplistic, and I found Anderson a bit evasive on a couple of topics, but he was mostly open and informative.
What I came away with was this. The WPA brings benefits to the players as follows:
What WPA Provides
1) Ensuring IOC recognition of pool
a) Making govt money available to players in many countries
b) Drug testing program administration
c) Ensuring World Games participation
2) Establishment of standards of presentation and behavior
a) Dress code
b) Sponsorship issues
c) Logos on clothing
3) Referee training programs
4) Junior programs and world championships
5) Potential sponsors can define/assess the product (which players are members
6) Legitimacy that WPA ranking point availability brings vitalizes events and improves fields
7) WPA Sanctioned and Member event planning and administration
Why I Feel the WPA Contract Issue is Blowing Up
The main factor for me is that many of the benefits and services provided by the WPA offer little to the American professional player. This is why many an American player is taking the view that “Why should I agree to do things the WPA way when so few of their activities benefit me?” In contrast, many overseas players get far more benefit and are, consequently, keener on having a governing body that manages and positions professional pool worldwide. In short, the results of WPA efforts are far more tangible to overseas pro players than they are to American pro players.