This is an interesting point.
I took a closer look at the ratings of those who cashed in the mixed 8-ball singles events to see how their Fargo ratings were affected by their finish in their respective tournaments, and the results were eye opening.
First of all, I believe the ratings cutoffs were:
Division - Minimum/Maximum
Bronze - No minimum/463
Silver - 464/534
Gold - 536/625
Platinum - 626/720
I'm least sure of the maximum Gold Fargo rating, but I'm fairly sure it was within 10 points of 625.
They paid out to 32nd place in the Bronze division. Of those 32, 21 finished with a Fargo rating at 463 or under. 7 out of the top 16 finished with Fargo rating of 463 or under. It gets grim when you look at the top 8, in which only 1 player finished with a Fargo rating under the cutoff of 463. Every one of the top 4 finishers in the Bronze division finished with a Fargo rating above 463.
They paid out to 96th place in the Silver division. Of those 96, 71 finished with a Fargo rating at 535 or under. 17 out of the top 32, but only 3 out of the top 16 finished at 535 or under. ZERO of the top 8 finished with a Fargo rating at 535 or under.
They paid out to 96th place in the Gold division. Of those 96, a whopping 88 finished with a Fargo rating at 625 or under. 26 out of the top 32, and 11 out of the top 16 finished at 625 or under. 5 out of the top 8, and 3 out of the top 4 finished under 625.
15 out of the top 16 finishers in the Bronze and Silver divisions ended up with Fargo rating above the established cutoff. Silver in particular seems to be poorly handicapped with 13 out of the top 16, and EVERY player in the top 8 finishing with a rating above the cutoff.
Take it as you will.
Pax,
Taek