Dark, very even black-black ebony has been additionally stained.
First priority is how the cue plays.
Beyond that I do dig ebony. Certain types of ebony cues are legendary.
Esthetically I do dig ebony. But I do really dig figured woods as well. Various types of rosewood and coco are amazing.
For me, it depends on the cue.
The only wood I don't like the look of in a cue is oak. Show me an oak cue I like and I will be surprised. Yes, including Titlist curs.
.
.
Dark, very even black-black ebony has been additionally stained.
I have a stack of Madagascar ebony that would disagree.
Ebony is a wood that looks nice with anything, and emboldens/accentuates the colors & figures in any wood used with it. To me there's nothing more beautiful than a heavy curled piece of maple, and there's no wood that can show it off better than ebony. When making cues, I am always conscious of contrasting not only colors, but also figures. I don't often put curly on curly, or burl on burl, just like I wouldn't put orange on orange. There has to be contrast to boldly separate design components. With ebony, it's idiot proof. You can do anything on ebony, except maybe ebony, and it by default looks good.
Doc about about eight years ago there was a thread about a cue made from
a piece of Oak found in a pile of firewood. The pics of this cue changed my thoughts on Oak cues, it looked amazing. I have tried to find the thread several times with no luck.
I will keep looking and try and change your mind![]()
Somebody out there likes it.....
Every time I build a ebony on ebony 4 pt it's generally one of the first to go and I get 4 or 5 requests for one just like it with the only change being different colored veneers.
Ebony certainly does not have to be stained to be so black you have to take it outside in the sun to see the end grain rays. Actually very rare IMO and highly sought out by not only builders but buyers in the know alike.
The only American ebony is?
The only American ebony is?
Should I assume this also is eligible for the ebony wood fire?