I have always favored BCA or ACS leagues myself because I feel the overall level of competition is stronger, the pay backs are usually higher, and the Vegas tournaments are open to everyone who is sanctioned. In Arizona we have them all: APA, TAP, BCA, ACS and VNEA, and the APA is still the biggest even though the BCA has been around the longest. As a matter of fact, the BCA and ACS leagues here have fewer players combined than any one of the other systems mentioned.
After giving this particular phenomenon much thought, I've come to the conclusion that the vast majority of players out there are not like me (and probably you, since you're reading this). They don't take the game seriously. They are just out to have fun. They make new acquaintances and build new friendships. They get out of the house once or twice a week and they play good (for them), or bad, and it really doesn't matter which because they are just having a good time. And they are willing to pay for that good time. They don't expect money back - they'll take it if offered, but they really don't EXPECT it. Most of them will be happy if they can just win a trophy at some point in time. And here's the kicker; most of them have no desire to go beyond this level of play. But that's all good. For those who want to "graduate" to more serious play, the BCA and ACS are there for them. And for those who don't, good, because the pool rooms need that vast horde of players to help make ends meet.
So I love the APA and all the other "fun" leagues. They all contribute to this wonderful world of pool! :thumbup:
Roger
Roger you realize this post makes too much sense for the topic?

Just kidding, this is pretty much the long and short of it and most people can't accept that people play for different reasons.