when will the winner be announced?
I think it was just the curiosity of not knowing,who made the cue. It did play super! The cue put the angle ,speed and spin on the ball,very well. Thank you Sir for helping us all out!!!! (the testers). I think most of us wanted to know who was going to deliver a cue,and didn't!!! I thought Manny wanted snake wood pts, into a African black wood front ,with ivory joint, butt cap with 400 inlays- or something of that nature. Ha ha I know thanks to all . personally you should have been able to stay silent- mark
I am one of the ones who didn't give feed back. When I got the cues I didn't get but one night to actually play with them. I know I could have kept them longer but felt an obligation to keep them moving along.
The one night I did play with them I had my favorite but still didn't feel qualified to give everyone my opinion. When I play with a new cue it generally takes me a week or more of steady playing with it to decide if I like it.
So long story short is I really didn't want to give any false opinions of any cue maker who had taken the time effort to participate in this.
So I apologize.
Thanks for including me, Mike
PS I think Eric would be a very good friend to have.
I am not sure if you got them back yet Shawn, but a majority of the old school players in Syracuse preferred cue #2. The runner ups were 7 (the sneaky), and then 4/5. They liked the way it hit, and the response from the cue ball. They set up independent tests for each player, that way each player would write down what they think, and only discuss once all players have tried them. They would try specific shots that they're use to, and know how each shot would end up, its based on how they'd normally play, and grade it on that.
They all like cue 2 the most, half like 7 and the other like 4 and 5. The people that liked 4/5 noticed a roll in 7, maybe that was the cause. Ironically, they've never heard of B&D and neither have I. Additional comments are: the finish on cue 3 began to chip off, and the linen on Cue 4 wasnt pressed like cue 2.
To all who feel affected, I owe a giant apology. I built the 5th cue. I apologize mostly to the other cuemakers and hope they can understand my position & purpose.
Toward the end of the logistical planning, several of the builders "suddenly" decided they couldn't send cues. One even just quit communicating instead of offering a reason. This left Shawn standing with his pants down, showing his ass to the world. He had put in a ton of time & effort to make it happen, even giving several time extensions to the builders. I felt bad for him & I tried helping him in the only way I know how. I began looking for cuemakers. Only one cuemaker agreed, which was Wes Hunter, but he only agreed on the condition that I would as well. I was kind in a tough spot & chose the lesser of two evils. I would help Shawn, a friend, even if it meant taking some heat for it myself. Wes & I literally had days to build our cues & we each did the best we could given the time we had to prepare. I don't want to speak for Wes, but given as much time as the rest, i'm sure each of us could have provided something better for everybody. I thank him for helping me. It essencially was me asking a friend for help to help another friend. He wasn't happy about the short notice & only did so because I pulled the friend card on him. Thank you again, Wes.
Most regretably, I was supposed to stay out of it. I was only supposed to referee & assign numbers. I am very much sorry to everybody for getting involved. I did the duty I said i'd do and I did it with absolutely no bias. If anything, I tried to be sure my cue had no extra frills anywhere of any kind that would pursuade bias. I wanted to remain anonymous because I had nothing to gain nor lose. I didn't want anybody wanting to order a cue from me because they liked the tester, and me have to tell them no. That kinda defeats the purpose. So I thought it would be best to remain anonymous to avoid any hurt feelings or misled testers. As I see now, my fears of having to speak up have become apparent. I knew i'd take some heat, but it's worth it to me in trade for helping a friend. What i'm not ok with is Shawn taking heat for me. He never knew until testing was completed. He wasn't happy about me remaining anonymous & didn't see anything wrong with me building a cue, but honored my wishes. Him taking heat for this is why I am posting this now. He was simply covering my ass the way I tried covering his ass. It's what friends do. So again, I offer my most sincere apology. I hope you all understand. If not, well I guess it's ok to hate me.
As for my cue, give it to Manny Perez. He's the son of 9ball, Hector Perez, an AZ member. The kid is an aspiring player and I have agreed to give him a cue, but wasn't fast enough to get it to him before his BEF tourney. He gave all of his saved up tourney winnings to Ashley Nandrasy so she could go compete in the WPBA Open next week. So i'd like for the cue to either go directly to him, or sell the cue in an auction or raffle & give 100% proceeds to him & i'll continue building his cue. Either is fine by me. That kid is deserving. Manny, hopefully you get to the big show![]()
One last time, i'm sorry to anybody who feels affected. I hope I never offended anybody.
QBuilder, you have done the honorable thing and owned up to being the maker of cue #5. As I said in many posts, it was my favorite cue, and the favorite of most of the reviewers in my location. The fact that you built this cue in such a short time is amazing.
That said, I think it was unethical to pretend to be an unbiased observer when you were not. I see absolutely nothing in any of your comments to indicate that you were anything other than very professional in all your efforts and commentary, but the appearance of bias tainted this whole effort and tarnished the name of your good friend.
You appear to have had the best of intentions here, helping out Shawn when he needed it. That is admirable and you are indeed a true friend. But your poor judgement in this instance has had an opposite result.
I'm very glad that you came forward and explained this situation. You were forthright, you took the hit and cleared Shawn's name, and I admire you for that. I also think you're a damned fine cuemaker and would feel lucky to own one.
"I am not trying to be mean when I say this and it will probably be taken the wrong way, but John Biddle, I dont care if you think my name was tarnished in this...it really doesnt matter to me. I did everything I said I would do, I didnt try to hide anything. I honestly feel if my name is tarnished, it is just with you, and I am ok with that, I am sure I will survive". SHAWN
Shawn: I think you did a stand up job and I told you early on that this takes balls and, unfortunately, no good deed goes unpunished. As for those who criticize you (and all the cue makers who participated) for doing what they don't have the balls to do TS and just consider the source.
Denali Cues maker of cue #3 which Melissa Little (the only pro player to test the cues) deemed "BEST OVERALL".