Bar table pool vs. big table pool

So is the consensus then that it's tougher to play on a bar table.

Also, to address the comment about the size of the tables. To my knowledge a "bar" table is one that is 3.5x7 feet. It is the same scale as a 4.5x9 foot or a 4x8. I think that just about all billiard tables are twice as long as they are wide. Which of course brings up the pocket openings and distance as a factor.

For the person who brought snooker into the conversation, snooker tables play completely differently with the cloth, cushion profile and pocket facings being different. So I don't find that this is an apt comparison in this thread but it does have validity in the larger context of billiards in general.

I wanted to add something I forgot before about Buddy. In Rags to Rifleman he is said to have said that on the barbox you don't need to ever play for the side pockets. He said you can play most of your position for the four corners. So I guess in that sense it's easier to play on the barbox.

I guess numerically speaking there will never be an eight foot shot on a 7 foot table so in that sense there will be a lot more "difficult" shots on a 9 footer than on the 7 footer.

I still think though that a good player should be well rounded enough to be able to play great on either table but I can appreciate that some will be better or worse on the table they are used to.
 
Chris
I liked your post..seems like you have a good handle on your game..I drill some what the same way on tables I will be playing on just to get a feeling on what's..what.

Cbi..yes I agree...Glenn Atwell is a great bar box player..I've played him a few times,but mostly just enjoyed the few times I had just sitting an talking with him..
 
I know when I got back into pool after a 14-year hiatus (I'd put my cues away for 14 years to focus on my career), I oiled my squeaky wheels on the big table, and got back in stroke in the big table environment. After I felt comfortable with my stroke again, I was invited to join a bar table league. (This was several years ago.) I thought I'd string rack after rack on the bar table, thinking it was just a smaller version of the 9-footer, and I was playing well in the big table environment.

Boy, did I have a rude awakening coming to me! Even though the shots were easier on the bar table, I still had my head handed to me, because I was overrunning position with the heavy or magnetic cue ball, underestimated the difficulty of the bar table's undersized side pockets (when approached from an angle, that is), and just in general realized that I grossly underestimated the bar table environment. It took a bit of focused playing and practice, over a couple years, before I could confidently say I could make the switch and play at or near the same level between the two dissimilar environments.

And I have had the opposite experience. I found I could switch from the 9 footer to the barbox easily and vice versa. Maybe that just means I play equally bad on both but in every league I have ever played in I have been one of the top shooters around. Even in Fort Collins Colorado which has some REALLY good players I was up there with most of them and I played primarily on the big table and only on the bar box for league or league tournaments. That is to say I never practiced on the barbox.

Later I did own a couple barboxes and I had the pockets tightened up on them. But this was after my league days were pretty much done and I only had the barboxes because I got them cheap enough and they were easy to move around. And I used to mess around on them and practice once in a while.

I just always felt that pool is pool and that the biggest danger to playing on a bar table was taking it for granted that it was easier to play on.

As for the side pockets. I don't really know what to say there. Buddy said in his book that he doesn't play for position on the side pockets. In league matches I and my teammates have made some sick outs shooting into the side pocket so I think that the level of play might be high enough now that players don't have trouble with the side pockets.

For the record in case anyone wants to know, I did finish 17th in the nation one year in the BCA Open division out of something like 800 player in 9 ball playing on Valley Barboxes. This was done while I was also running the Instroke booth in between matches. I finally ran out of gas at midnight after being awake since 6am that day, with my first match at 8am. So I can play, a little. Although it's getting to be a little less each year :-)
 
I think it is easier to lose respect (focus) for the small table while running out. This is the only difference to me. I like a ten foot with 4 inch pockets the table demands respect on every shot.

It's like I always say the balls don't change size.
 
Surface area. The congestion and cluttering that happens on bar tables is a result of a simple equation: Less surface area + same size balls = the balls take up more space. One or two balls in the center of the table can look like watermelons when you are trying to get around them for shape.

Russ said it best, winning consistently on bar tables requires a different style of position play.

I think (and some of the great players I've talked to about this agree with me) that running a rack of 8ball on the bar box is much harder than running a rack of 8ball or 9ball on the 9 footer.
 
So is the consensus then that it's tougher to play on a bar table.

.

John, I would disagree entirely....I'll take ownership if my post said something contrary previously, it was not intended....

IMHO, they are similar games, but there are nuances that make them very different.....kinda like the difference between an indoor soccer player that plays in an incased, small field, and one who plays on a huge outdoor field at the world cup....granted, players at the highest level can adapt and perform greatly at either, but there are inherent differences...

If I had to pick one that was harder, I would give a slight edge to the big table.....reasoning - let's say you had a local B player with a good game on both tables....any top player offers to play him on a 9 foot diamond pro or a bar box in a race to 3, giving 10 to 1 odds.....IMHO, the better odds are with the bar box for the lesser player and that is where I'd want my money.....in my pool life, I have taken far more "bad beats" from the box than I have the big tables...conversely, I have beaten players twice my speed on smaller tables, and on the bigguns they just mop up with me :D
 
John,

The Bar Tables I have played on had buckets for pockets in the Corners. With the big cueball follow was prefered for position. Now I play on 9 footers because that's what is handy in the area where I live. I have played on the Diamond 7 footers for league and found them to be easier than the 9 footers though I'm not sure why unless it's just because you don't have to turn the cueball loose to play some positions. I prefer the 9 foot tables. Just my 2 cents.
 
imo going from a big table to a small table is pretty easy, but going from a small table to a big table is tough.
 
And I have had the opposite experience. I found I could switch from the 9 footer to the barbox easily and vice versa. Maybe that just means I play equally bad on both but in every league I have ever played in I have been one of the top shooters around. Even in Fort Collins Colorado which has some REALLY good players I was up there with most of them and I played primarily on the big table and only on the bar box for league or league tournaments. That is to say I never practiced on the barbox.

John:

One thing I gather from your post (as verified by your "17th in the nation one year in the BCA Open division" comment below) is that you're talking 9-ball on a barbox. When I made my original post above (the one you quoted and responded to), I was talking 8-BALL. Big difference, my friend. Personally, I find 9-ball on a barbox to be easier than on the big table. I won't go as far as saying small-rack rotation pool on a barbox is "child's play," but I will say that, like you, I ran over people in my area playing small-rack rotation pool on a barbox. And these were strong players as well -- not your average bar banger.

Put all 15 balls on that table, in those close quarters, and only be able to shoot at the solids or only at the stripes, and maneuver around the congestion. And, try not to commit the grand faux pas of 8-ball, which is to run "most" of your category of balls, miss (or stitch yourself), and leave your opponent in a position where the table is a veritable turkey shoot -- he/she can shoot at anything he/she wants, with almost impunity, and have the ability at every turn to safe you if he/she wants -- because you only have one or two balls on the table. The ol' "one ball hell" as it's known in 8-ball circles.

*This* is where the comments about congestion, precise positioning of the cue ball (especially when it's a non-standard cue ball -- e.g. overweight/oversized, magnetic, et al.) come into play. It's not small-rack rotation pool; rather it's full-rack 8-ball.

Later I did own a couple barboxes and I had the pockets tightened up on them. But this was after my league days were pretty much done and I only had the barboxes because I got them cheap enough and they were easy to move around. And I used to mess around on them and practice once in a while.

Barboxes are great for that -- having one nearby to smack a few balls into pockets, to keep in stroke.

I just always felt that pool is pool and that the biggest danger to playing on a bar table was taking it for granted that it was easier to play on.

That was the whole point of my post, John -- the "chewy center," if you will. That was what I was getting at when I admitted, freely and publicly, that after I got back in stroke in a big table environment after a 14-year hiatus, that I thought I'd "string rack after rack" in that "toy" bar table environment, and I, in fact, had a rude awakening coming to me.

At least I admitted that I made this mistake, and took the corrective measures to make sure I never make that mistake again. I'm certainly not one of these "fault-proof keyboard Olympians" we find here on these boards.

Nowadays, if I don't say so myself, I play a decent bar-table game. Probably an indicator of my bar-table play is that I took down the Greenfields 2009 End-of-Year Open 9-ball tournament held on this past New Year's Eve. (I visit my folks in Denver, Colorado, every year around the holidays. I never take my cues with me, because it's such a pain to travel with them. Plus, I feel that my playing ability shouldn't have to be "bolted to the hip" of my personal cues, so I shoot with a "Wall-abushka" that I pull off the wall whenever I can. This time at Greenfields was no exception -- I pulled a house cue off the wall and played the tourney with it, against players that came from miles around to play in this tourney, some from as far away as Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, etc. I snapped it off, and I can tell ya, there were some very unhappy midwesterners, upset that this happy-go-lucky Guiness-drinking "New Yawka" came in from out of town and took this tourney with a house cue.)

As for the side pockets. I don't really know what to say there. Buddy said in his book that he doesn't play for position on the side pockets. In league matches I and my teammates have made some sick outs shooting into the side pocket so I think that the level of play might be high enough now that players don't have trouble with the side pockets.

One thing to consider why Buddy never played for position on the side pockets, may be the reason I already cited -- that the side pockets are POISON unless one has a lot of familiarity shooting at them from off angles. The corner pockets on a barbox are a lot more proportionately sized, and forgiving, than its side pockets.

And, from my side of things, once I realized all these things peculiar to the bar-table, I made it a point to not look like a fool again -- to never make the assumption that I'd "string racks" on it sight-unseen. I practiced intently on side pocket shots, and even "invented" my own version of 1-pocket where the shots are played into the side pockets, for shot practice reasons on the barbox. It worked. I now feel very confident about planning my runout strategy with side pocket shots.

Lately, I've been playing more snooker than pool, and I've in fact re-architected (if that's a word?) my stance and fundamentals on snooker fundamentals. Remember the earlier poster who made the analogy of "put a snooker player on a bar table and watch what happens"? That is actually true -- I can't explain to you how profoundly accurate the game of snooker will make a player. It elevated my game, that's for sure.

For the record in case anyone wants to know, I did finish 17th in the nation one year in the BCA Open division out of something like 800 player in 9 ball playing on Valley Barboxes. This was done while I was also running the Instroke booth in between matches. I finally ran out of gas at midnight after being awake since 6am that day, with my first match at 8am. So I can play, a little. Although it's getting to be a little less each year :-)

For the record, John, I'm an Open-class player, and I play on the Tony Robles/Predator Open/Pro 10-ball Tour. I will also be playing in the Super Billiards Expo Open 10-ball Professional Players Championship. So I'm no banger either. :) And, although I'm getting older (I'll turn 44 this March 6th), I have a lot of lost time to make up for with that 14-year hiatus I took. As a matter of fact... [speaks in an Al Pacino-like gravely voice] "I'm just gettin' started!" :thumbup2:

-Sean
 
Okay let me put my 2 cents in . The main reason for 9-ball being easier on the small table is the break . It is harder to break and get a shot on a big table at about a 4 to 1 clip . Ask a good player how many racks he has b and r ed on a big table and ask again about how many on the small table . I would bet that 99% would say that they had a higher number on the small table . Now 8-ball is a different matter . the big table version is easier because of more space and less clustering . Again that is for players that are good on both tables . your average league player will find it harder because of distance and shot execution . I have seen plenty of great small table players lose their way on big tables . A good big table player will adjust far easier to a small table than a small table player will adjust to a big table . as long as the cue balls are not in too bad of shape , or are the same for both tables . David is right when he says that a " good " player should adapt to either table easily . For the average player it is much easier to go from big to small .
 
I like BIG Pool Tables, like 4.5" x 9.0' ers, and do not like playing on a BAR BOXS. As where I live we got Big Tables I am use too.

Seems everytime I go to some Tournaments with BAR BOXES I wind up spending a small fortune in Quarters! Coming home with ZERO, and that = NOTHING!

Sadly most of the Tournaments in the VALLEY of the SUN are on Bar Table in BAr or Sports BARS, and between the Quarter, Drunks, and Loud Music I have decided to say PASS.

Hope someday, someone OPENS a REAL POOL Room in the Valley of the Sun (on the westside), like Kolby’s in TEMPE on the (eastside) with Big Table, and some weekly tournaments.

One of these day I got to venture over to Kolby’s again, to play in a Tournament.
 
So is the consensus then that it's tougher to play on a bar table.



I guess numerically speaking there will never be an eight foot shot on a 7 foot table so in that sense there will be a lot more "difficult" shots on a 9 footer than on the 7 footer.

sniped/QUOTE]

if the playing surface on a bar box is 3.5x7 feet then the longest shot should be about 7.826 feet. Cue ball in Corner pocket and object in the opposite corner pocket.
 
Another point i forgot to put in my previous post is that when they changed the rules of 8-ball to allow the breaker open table regardless of what was made on the break it made the game at least 25% easier to run out . On a big table even 35% easier . Don't get me started on 9-ball rules .
 
I would forget anything I heard in the TAR chat and just go by what Matlock said. Why would anyone question that?

I personally don't like bar box at all. I can play well on a big table, but when it comes to the bar box, I get in trouble trying to get the same kind of shape and shoot the same shots as the big table, and that often gets me scratches, and hooked by ever-so-slight margins of error. What Buddy said is a political answer and besides, when is Buddy known to tell the truth?
 
I would forget anything I heard in the TAR chat and just go by what Matlock said. Why would anyone question that?

I personally don't like bar box at all. I can play well on a big table, but when it comes to the bar box, I get in trouble trying to get the same kind of shape and shoot the same shots as the big table, and that often gets me scratches, and hooked by ever-so-slight margins of error. What Buddy said is a political answer and besides, when is Buddy known to tell the truth?

Maybe you should just learn to play shape! If you did the size wouldn't matter! LOL

Jeremy
 
Big tables are tougher

I just joined the forum and found this thread. I have been playing on bar tables for 15yrs both in league play and money play. I am probably the toughest player in my area on a box. I recently joined a league played on Diamond 9ft tables and I am struggling. The skid on the fast cloth is killing me! I have to relearn where to hit the ball on most spin cuts and banks. I am finding the transition very tough.

IMO, big table play is much harder. The table is much more open and there are a lot fewer trouble balls, but the patterns are very different. I have lost matches to players that I would give weight to on a box. It is very frustrating, especially in the APA league, where my handicaps are 7 and 9 in 8 ball and 9 ball.
 
I just joined the forum and found this thread. I have been playing on bar tables for 15yrs both in league play and money play. I am probably the toughest player in my area on a box. I recently joined a league played on Diamond 9ft tables and I am struggling. The skid on the fast cloth is killing me! I have to relearn where to hit the ball on most spin cuts and banks. I am finding the transition very tough.

IMO, big table play is much harder. The table is much more open and there are a lot fewer trouble balls, but the patterns are very different. I have lost matches to players that I would give weight to on a box. It is very frustrating, especially in the APA league, where my handicaps are 7 and 9 in 8 ball and 9 ball.

I gave up trying to play on the big table years ago!I play bar boxes only.
I don't care if I never get to play on a big table again!:D
 
Another big difference, primarily with the Valley tables is the difference in the size of the side pockets and the corner pockets. In the old days, when I had my pool room, I could watch a player on a Gold Crown and after a while I could usually tell if they were primarily a barbox player by their shot selection and position play. They'd seldom play position to pocket balls in the side pockets unless they were hangers or it was the only pocket the ball would go in. On the barboxes, the corner pockets were buckets while the side pockets were very small in comparison. On the Diamonds this isn't nearly as drastic.
 
Back
Top