Where can we go to see the list of players that have already signed up ?
there's a difference between "signed-up", vs "paid".
Where can we go to see the list of players that have already signed up ?
there's a difference between "signed-up", vs "paid".
Leave it at 128/1000. He spent so much time thinking and figuring that out. Now, it's time to see that plan through and see how it pans out. This back and forth now is not a good idea after months and months of 128/1000.
After the tournament at 128/1000, the successes and areas for improvement can be discussed.
Well maybe, just maybe, the plan turned out to be financially unfeasible. I, also, suspect than he has a very light field signed and paid up right now.
If this is the case, I think that it would be advisable and necessary to try and fix it now, before the financial dominoes begin to fall. And, if the increased entry fee was the reason for the shortfall, then the answer may be lowering it. Unfortunately, you won't know if your new "plan" will work until you make the proposed change to $700...and then, if you don't get enough additions, there will be an even larger shortfall. What will you do if that happens?
I certainly wish the tournament the best.
J
From a vendor stand point I don't think the number of players will matter to them. Most of them will not buy much anyway. Of course the better the players the more people will come to watch. This will help the vendors. The BB tournament will really help the vendors so I really hope this goes off well. I really don't think dropping the entry fee now will change anything at this time. Most of the average players that were going to play have already used their vacation to do other things when the entry was raised to 1K. JMO I wish the tournament the best and hope everything works out
I think its a good idea not to limit the number of players, but the cost of playing should be the same for everyone. If more than 128 people play, it certainly helps the financials. If not, then that information is there for future Opens.
The vendors would be better off operating across the street from portable sales trucks. Or renting an outdoor tent to sell their goods.
I love the vendors inside, plus many are selling high end cues that would not do well outside. I remember the peak years of Derby City with many Vendors lining the hallways, and crowds of players/ fans packed in there.It was a great atmosphere.
Send people out this week to every room within 3 hours and get them to host qualifyers to make sure you have the 128 at 1000.... I would have 16 player $60 qualifyers at QMasters until 16 players don't show up and I would have them non-stop the days before the Open in case guys want to come up 2-3 days early and have 4-5 shots at getting in on the cheap.... 128 at $1000 is doable and there is time.... Call Tracy in Memphis, Phil Windham in Chattanooga... Ed at Sandcastle in New Jersey.... Peg at JOB's in Nashville.. Janet at Bordeline in Bristol..... I am sure we can likely add contacts and rooms across the nation that SHOULD have qualifyers... I played in one in Crossville TN in 1995 I think that was $40 entry.. IF they could host one then c'mon...
Chris
Which do you think would work best?
By Barry Behrman
I'm going back & forth in my mind about several important matters pertaining to this year's U.S. Open. That's right, "Open". As I ponder if I'm doing the right & best thing to do. Such as cutting off the field at 128 players? Such as the high entry fee & trying my best to make as many players, sponsors, vendors, the greatest fans on Earth, & more as happy as possible.
So I'm asking the pool world, "What Should I Do?" Here is one example. Having 175 or so players pay only $700.00 comes to $122,500.00 & added money of $72,000.00 comes to around $195,000.00. By doing so now most players who have been playing for years will be able to continue which brings more people to the event, a welcome sight. Why have less is the question I'm asking myself every day. This is an easy fix to have 175 plus players paying $700.00 by just using 4 additional tables in the other ballroom for the first 2-3 days. Start the event as usual on Sunday rather than Monday, have the players meeting as usual at 4 pm Saturday & by 9 pm players will know what time they may play Sunday starting at 11 am.
I'm adding $72,000.00 regardless of the number of players as a Tier II W.P.A. points sanctioned event, leaving 1st place at $30,000.00 & continue to pay deep. I want my sponsors, vendors, more players, & fans which is why I'm asking for "your input". It's not too late to make a positive improvement which I feel this certainly is. Or do I leave it as it is now? What do you think?