Thank you Dave. You have proved what Scott and Randy have been saying. The amount of spin transfer is, at best, extremely slight, nearly to the point of being insignificant. You also show that the condition of the balls (chalk on the ball) can make the amount of transfer quite inconsistant.
The follow causing draw appeared to cause the object ball to change orientation by perhaps 1 or 2 degrees while the skid looked to be about 3 or 4 inches. From a practical standpoint, I don't see where either draw or follow on the cue ball would have any noticable difference in what the object ball will do. They are both going to end the skidding and begin to pick up forward roll at nearly the exact same distance after contact.
Steve
The follow causing draw appeared to cause the object ball to change orientation by perhaps 1 or 2 degrees while the skid looked to be about 3 or 4 inches. From a practical standpoint, I don't see where either draw or follow on the cue ball would have any noticable difference in what the object ball will do. They are both going to end the skidding and begin to pick up forward roll at nearly the exact same distance after contact.
Steve