In bold.... I know there is no traditional nose behind the cb reference, like with fractional aimjng, but to say there is no reference in Pro1 is just incorrect. Stan can call A, B, C, and ob edge and ccb whatever he wants, but those are reference points. They are referenced to get an ETA, ETB, ETC, and CTE in order to get the "fixed" cb perception. And the perception itself is a reference also.
After all, the offset sweep is in reference to the perception.
You don’t know CTE either. Surely, you don’t think that Stan would be doing a TRUTH SERIES and a book without having totally solved the process.
Honestly, you’d look totally foolish at a table trying to explain CTE with Stan around.
Connie Shuffett